She said it with a straight face too without choking on her words. She said that the process of selling off all his assets would create even more possible conflicts. Another unsubstantiated pronouncement from an ignoramus. Others have done that very thing. Sold off ALL their assets. Yes. At a loss. So what? She is ridiculous and a very bad attorney if she thinks what she said makes any sense. It doesn't. It is ludicrous but as usual these pronouncement makers NEVER provide details to back up the allegations. They just say whatever the he** they think will work and do not expect to be questioned about it. Do you question or just sit quietly there and swallow it whole? Why?
Hi Rosie. I actually believe her. If he sold off his assets we would find out his liabilities are higher than his assets and he would be broke. That definitely "would create more possible conflicts."
Fun fact: Did you know that of all presidents & presidential candidates, he leads the pack in the number of lawsuits both filed against him & suits he has filed against others. This was published before the election: