Discussion»Statements»Rosie's Corner» Trump got Marla Maples preggers while he was still married to Ivanna Trump. Should Hillary bring that up if he brings up Bill's sexual past?
I would suggest she doesn't lower herself to his level of tackiness. I think Trump is slitting his own throat politically .. no one needs to help him along.
I don't see what Bill's sexual dalliances have to do with Hillary. But if it were you and your spouse were being attacked would you not attack back in some way Baba? Would you just ignore it? I mean Hillary can't really defend Bill's actions since they were unforgivable and certainly indefensible but why can't she call the pot who calls the kettle black also black as well? Thank you for your reply and Happy Friday! :)
Trump was NOT married to Ivanna when Marla got pregnant. Ivanna was granted an uncontested divorce in 1991 with final financial settlement in 1992. Tiffany Trump was born on October 13, 1993. No way did Marla Maples carry Tiffany for almost 2 years! Trump and Maples were married 2 months after Tiffany's birth.
Personally, I don't agree with the extra-marital behavior of either Trump or Clinton and believe those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks. BUT, the difference is Ivanna divorced Trump for his continued infidelity while Hillary appears to not only enable her husband but viciously attacked the women he 'messed around' with. I personally think she only stayed with him because Bill took her to the top. She'd never be where she is today without him.
This post was edited by my2cents at September 29, 2016 11:41 AM MDT
THe4re's no debating that both Trump and Bill are cheating scumbags. The question about Hillary is totally 3d party and you have to ask yourself...if that was YOUR husband, what would you do? (Besides kicking his ass out the door)
Don't have to ask, Goat, because it did happen to me. Like Ivanna, I kicked his butt out the door. The difference at least, is Trump married his 'mistress,' while Bill apologized (do you remember the interview in '92?) for his behavior, but didn't stop.
That's exactly what I'm thinking too GJ. Hillary can't defend Bill because what he did was indefensible but why can't she call the pot who is calling the kettle black also black? Why is it okay for him to attack and not her? Thank you for your reply and Happy Friday! :)
To be honest, I don't think there is such a thing as the moral high ground anymore, but it won't help politics if there's a mudbath and dirty linen is washed in public.
Benedict Arnold 