Discussion » Questions » Science and Technology » There are so many varieties of Flora/Fauna. Possibly infinite. We keep discovering new ones. How many homo sapiens varieties exist?

There are so many varieties of Flora/Fauna. Possibly infinite. We keep discovering new ones. How many homo sapiens varieties exist?

Dozens, hundreds, thousands, millions?

Posted - May 26, 2017

Responses


  • 5354
    I dont know, but there are at least 60 different 'blood types' people can have (I found a list once)
      May 26, 2017 6:19 PM MDT
    3

  • 113301
    Really? I had no idea JakobA. I thought there were maybe 3-4! Shows ya what I know about stuff like that! Thank you for your reply and the helpful info. Happy Saturday! :)
      May 27, 2017 9:18 AM MDT
    0

  • 13071
    In the universe,  who knows. 
      May 26, 2017 6:56 PM MDT
    2

  • 113301
    Infinite? Thank you for your reply cp and Happy Saturday to thee! :)
      May 27, 2017 9:19 AM MDT
    1

  • 16239
    Extant? One species, but each individual is unique so the answer is either one or seven billion.

    As to the number of different varieties of flora and fauna, there's no possibiliy of that number being infinite. Even the number of particles in the universe is still a finite number, it's just extremely large - googol or thereabouts. This post was edited by Slartibartfast at May 27, 2017 9:19 AM MDT
      May 26, 2017 7:08 PM MDT
    3

  • 44224
    We think alike.
      May 27, 2017 8:44 AM MDT
    0

  • 113301
    Googolplex? Well we keep discovering previously unknown things. Within the species homo sapiens how many subclasses are there? Within those subclasses how many subsubclasses are there? Within those subsubclasses how many subsubsubclasses are there? It's as impossible for me to grasp "infinite" as it is to grasp that there was never a beginning. I mean so there was the BIG BANG. What existed  before that? Something had to or it could not have generated anything. Nothing comes from nothing. Something only comes from something, right?  SIGH. It's too big for my brain to handle. So I just wonder. Thank you for your reply Sbf! :)
      May 27, 2017 9:23 AM MDT
    0

  • 16239
    Not googolplex, that one was invented by mathematicians being smartasses - it has no practical application. The total number of elemental particles in the universe is estimated at slightly less than googol (ten to the hundredth power).
      May 27, 2017 5:25 PM MDT
    0

  • 113301
    GOOGOLPLEX

    "A number that is equal to 1 followed by a googol of zeroes and expressed as
    10 to the 10th power to the 100th power" The dictionary definition ends there. It does not corroborate your  opinion of the word.

    GOOGOL
    "A number that is equal to 1 followed by 100 zeros and expressed as 10 to the 100th power. It was introduced by US mathematician Edward Kasner whose 9-year-old nephew allegedly invented it."

    Where is the smarta**? Is this an example of your being one Sbf? You alluded to it elsewhere on other threads. I said I had not experienced that side of you. I believe I just did.
      May 28, 2017 4:56 AM MDT
    0

  • 16239
    Googolplex is a mathematical nonsense, there simply isn't anything that can be described by a number that big. Some smartass picked up on googol and ran with it. The universe isn't that many cubic microns in volume.
      May 28, 2017 6:57 AM MDT
    1

  • 3684
    Vast though finite number of species, but only one Homo Sapiens species because Homo is our genus and Sapiens, our species. All of our physical race and individual characteristics are only adaptations and variations of that species.
      May 28, 2017 4:56 PM MDT
    1

  • 3684
    Thank you for the Like.

    It occurred to me later that for a time H. Neanderthalis was considered a race of humans, rather than a separate but parallel species to our own as it was so similar; but the Neanderthals have been given their species rank back. So close though that the two appeared to have been able to interbreed - normally impossible between different species - suggesting to me at least, their disappearance may have been partly by absorption.

    The Neanderthals were for a long time regarded as a somewhat brutish, dim-witted lot, with no evidence to support that arrogance which gave rise to their name being a metaphor for anyone of such unsociable qualities, but modern palaeontologists and archaeologists have much more respect for them.
      May 29, 2017 9:42 AM MDT
    0