Active Now

Danilo_G
Malizz
Discussion » Questions » Babies and Kids » Are you for mandatory vaccinations for everyone?

Are you for mandatory vaccinations for everyone?

Posted - May 17, 2018

Responses


  • 6098
    Opposed.  I would err on the side of freedom. 
      May 17, 2018 4:40 AM MDT
    4

  • 13071
    Me too, but by the year 2019 they are coming. There will be a 500,000 dollar fine if you do not comply. Scary isnt it.
      May 17, 2018 4:42 AM MDT
    1

  • 10029
    ???

    In which country? Provide sources for this information, please. 
      May 17, 2018 5:57 AM MDT
    1

  • 44173
    Only for those who can afford them. Screw the poor people.
      May 17, 2018 4:53 AM MDT
    1

  • 6477
    Noooooooooooooooooooooo I am vehemently opposed to mandatory anything and especially vaccinations. I could bore for England on the subject.. so many people blindly believe and trust... if they took the time to really research and read they would find out that vaccination really isn't all it's cracked up to be
      May 17, 2018 5:38 AM MDT
    6

  • 10029
    There are exceptional circumstances, but in general, I support some vaccines being mandatory for admission to schools, and even being admitted to public places. 

    I think it's irresponsible of people to have no concern for others. 


      May 17, 2018 6:04 AM MDT
    3

  • 17364
    I'm for freedom and liberty.  Always.  
      May 17, 2018 6:34 AM MDT
    4

  • 6023
    Where does the personal "freedom and liberty" end?
    As soon as it infringes on someone else.

    So while "freedom and liberty" may allow one to opt out of getting a vaccination ... it may also allow government to say that "if you don't get a vaccination, you can't attend public school" because you put other people's health at risk.

    Of course, science is now at the point of attempting genetic alterations of human embryos.
    So what parent wouldn't want their kid to be genetically altered to be immune to {disease}?  (if the success rate was high enough)
      May 17, 2018 8:25 AM MDT
    2

  • 6098
    Answer:  any parent who believes in freedom and self-determination.   And oh rather a blessing to be kept out of most public schools which put a child's education at risk. 
      May 18, 2018 4:53 AM MDT
    0

  • 6023
    Sure.
    If any parent were told: "We can genetically alter your unborn child to make them immune to cancer, with no side effects for 95% of procedures" ... I don't care how much a parent believes in "freedom and self-determination".  It's about protecting their child.

    Belief in freedom and self-determination doesn't override a parent's duty to protect their child from harm.
    They don't say to a toddler "go ahead and touch that hot stove, because I believe in your freedom and self-determination".
      May 18, 2018 7:42 AM MDT
    1

  • 46117
    Of course not.
      May 17, 2018 8:28 AM MDT
    2

  • 5835
    No. A citizen always has the right to refuse a medical treatment. Always.
      May 17, 2018 2:38 PM MDT
    4

  • 13071
    Not by 2020. You will be vacinated or fined over $50,000 or imprisoned if you dont comply. Im for real. Terrible isnt it.
      May 17, 2018 8:55 PM MDT
    0

  • 10029

    Again, in what country? 

    PLEASE SITE YOUR SOURCE. 

      May 19, 2018 9:42 PM MDT
    1

  • 16197
    SITE  CITE
      May 20, 2018 4:22 PM MDT
    1

  • 10029
    Thanks, SBF. Randy would be so proud. 
      May 25, 2018 8:38 AM MDT
    0

  • 16197
    But should they have the right to refuse medical treatment for others, namely their children?
      May 20, 2018 4:24 PM MDT
    1

  • 5835
    The question is "Should We The People rob parents of their parental authority just because we live in fear?"
      May 20, 2018 9:04 PM MDT
    0

  • 16197
    If it puts the child at risk, YES. Indeed there's an argument for Child Services to remove the children from the "care" of irresponsible parents. It's more dangerous than leaving kids unrestrained in a moving vehicle (which is illegal everywhere).
      May 20, 2018 9:21 PM MDT
    0

  • 16197
    For children, yes. No parent has the right to risk the life of a child for the sake of "freedom". Can a person condemned to living inside an iron lung because his/her parents refused to have him/her vaccinated against poliomyelitis be considered "free"? Or a child choking to death from diphtheria? A baby born with hideous deformities because its mother wasn't vaccinated against rubella? Legislation requires children to be restrained in motor vehicles. This is more important.
    Onc a person becomes an adult, then prophylactic measures against communicable diseases becomes optional. It's the smart thing to do, but stupidity isn't illegal.
      May 17, 2018 5:12 PM MDT
    4

  • 5835
    The point of failure is when the law forbids suing the pharma company for making a lousy vaccine. At that point you have no idea what is in the vaccine and nobody is responsible for it.
      May 17, 2018 5:56 PM MDT
    1

  • 1713
    Eeks! No thanks, if other people are so concerned for their health they can get a vaccine if they want but don't force it on me. Maybe if there was a way not involving needles, I won't be such a wimp about it..
      May 17, 2018 7:29 PM MDT
    2

  • 6023
    They have the "blow it up your nose" type, for the flu.  
      May 18, 2018 7:44 AM MDT
    0

  • 22891
    kind of, i dont want to catch what they have
      May 18, 2018 4:01 PM MDT
    0