Active Now

Malizz
Maurice214
Element 99
Stu Spelling Bee
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » The most intensely emotional hostile-to-smokers folks I know are ex-smokers. Why?

The most intensely emotional hostile-to-smokers folks I know are ex-smokers. Why?

Posted - January 15, 2019

Responses


  • 14795
    I'm not and smoker or ex smoker Rosie.....but standing next to or being in a room with some one that does smoke or has had one is not a pleasant thing.......it lingers on their bodies,in their hair and on their clothing....

    My whole family doesn't smoke....I'm amazed that at £11 pounds a packet of 20 ...I'm supprised that anyone can afford then still...
    They must have money to burn I think.....:( 
      January 15, 2019 4:41 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    My sister and brother-in-law smoked for years. They both quit COLD TURKEY on my brother-in-law's 50th birthday. He is now 80! You should hear them go off on smokers if any happen to be around and they have to breathe in the polluted air they always leave behind. I mean I don't think much of those who smoke but I don't go ballistic about it. They do. Weird. I think smokers ruin their looks (smokers wrinkle more), they always stink (perfume or after shave doesn't cover up the stench...it just makes it more nauseating), yellows their teeth and stains their fingers. It's really a most oddball way of "taking care of yourself" but there is some draw there they cannot resist so they don't. And they die of lung cancer. Or their second-hand smoke causes their loved ones to die of emphysema (that's how and why my sister-in-law died). I don't get it. Thank you for your reply D!  :) My dad smoked a lot when I was  kid but that's when doctors advertised the benefits of smoking cigarettes. No one knew supposedly that they were death sticks both first-hand and second-hand. Well we know now so what's their excuse? This post was edited by RosieG at January 15, 2019 2:18 PM MST
      January 15, 2019 5:09 AM MST
    1

  • 14795
    I belive when Captain Drake or whoever discovered it in south america ...he brought it back to England and it became compulsory to be smoked it the real upper crust schools like Eaton and Westminster....  

    People  that smoke though seem to have more rights than those that don't though...:( 
      January 15, 2019 2:40 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    They willingly shorten their lives, ruin their looks, bring on pain to themselves and alienate the non-smokeres since mostly they light up wherever it's allowed and don't give a rat's a** about anyone else. I had double pneumonia decades ago and so when I encounter cigarette smoke I start coughing and have a hard time breathing. There are lotsa folks like me who have to put up with crapped-up air just so a smoker can get his/her fix. I think all smoking should occur in the smoker's car with windows shut. I think I'll ask a question about it. Thank you for your reply D and Happy Wednesday to thee!  :) This post was edited by RosieG at January 16, 2019 3:17 AM MST
      January 16, 2019 1:15 AM MST
    1

  • 14795
    Make them suffer Rosie...not us....lol
      January 16, 2019 2:58 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    I'd like to which is why I asked a question about it. Confine them to their cars with windows closed and their homes with doors and windows closed. The only legal places they can smoke. That way they get inhale all that crapped up air themselves and won't have to share it! Thank you for your reply D! :)
      January 16, 2019 3:18 AM MST
    1

  • 14795
    Can't you smoke walking down the road in America Rosia....they can in England....
      January 16, 2019 3:25 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    Sure. That's the problem. I have to breathe the crappy air they leave behind which is PRECISELY WHY I want that crap air confined to closed quarters. Their cars or homes. Period. So they get to breathe all the crapped up air they created and I don't have to. Seems very fair to me. I want CLEAN AIR. They don't care. Fine with me as long as they take their air to an elsewhere. Thank you for your reply D!  :)
      January 16, 2019 3:51 AM MST
    1

  • 16256
    It was Walter Raleigh. One of Elizabeth I's "favourites" (lovers?).
      January 16, 2019 3:09 AM MST
    1

  • 14795
    He needs his bum smacked then for starting such a filthy habit.....
    The government must love it and be so against totally banning it......How do you replace the billions in tax revenue if they ban it.....and also the loss of jobs and the tax they loose form those that's employed in making and distributing them.....
    Profits must always come before common sense.....
      January 16, 2019 3:22 AM MST
    0

  • 16256
    Smoking costs the NHS almost as much as the revenue it raises. Balances out.
      January 16, 2019 3:25 AM MST
    0

  • 14795
    I read that treating cost the NHS a fraction of what they raise in taxes....some years ago it was in all our news papers 
    If they ever banned it totally....how much more would they actually loose for from all the people that make and sell it ,plus the Business rates on all the factories that make and deliver the daily....all the workers an the manafacture of the machines that make them....shipping costs 
    it's got to be countless billions ....
    How would they make up that money loss....I'm sure the government won't take a cut in wages...
    they only know the words for more ,not less...
      January 16, 2019 3:43 AM MST
    0

  • 10468
    Possibly because they don't want to get hooked again.  It'd be like someone drinking in front of a recovering alcoholic.

    I can only assume as I've never smoked (and I never will), and no one in immediate family ever smoked.  
      January 15, 2019 5:35 PM MST
    2

  • 113301
    I think it's because they can never get over being hooked on something so harmful and so are especially sensitive to those who keep doing it. I never asked them. I've just observed them. Thank you for your reply Shuhak and Happy Wednesday. I have an idea about smokers which I'm gonna ask a question about. See whatcha think if you have the time!  :)
      January 16, 2019 1:17 AM MST
    1

  • because they know from first hand experience its nasty af 
      January 15, 2019 5:36 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    I guess that must be it em-sc. Thank you for your reply! :)
      January 16, 2019 1:18 AM MST
    0

  • 16256
    I quit years ago for financial reasons (it's expensive in Australia, tobacco  taxes are equivalent to robbery with volience). I'm not hostile towards smokers exactly, I just refuse to listen when they kvetch about being broke.
      January 16, 2019 3:15 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    What about the crapped-up air R? Does that not bother you having to breath it? Can folks use food stamps to buy cigarettes I wonder? Do they have food stamps in Australia. I was shocked that Nick got booted out in the first round! I wonder what others shocks are gonna happen? Thank you for your reply and Happy Wednesday to thy! :)
      January 16, 2019 3:21 AM MST
    0

  • 16256
    We don't have those in Australia, our welfare system is still cash. At least for now.
      January 16, 2019 3:26 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    Oh. Okey dokey R. Thank you for the info!  :)
      January 16, 2019 3:48 AM MST
    0