The HORDES of people defending don dwindle daily. How long before there are NONE?

I find that photo scary because at the mall she would look like a sweet little old lady but in reality she is a Nazi at heart. Reminds me of part of one of Alice Coopers song - they look just like people at Kresge`s and Woolworth`s but decadent brains were at work to destroy. Cheers!

:):):)

You are looking at it MACROSCOPICALLY Sharon. I am focusing on it MICROSCOPICALLY. Specifically how many Answermuggers used to show up to defend little donny dingbat who don't bother any longer? There were dozens before. Now? Well there are a coupla regulars who respond by rote from what they read on an "approved" site. That's it. That's all. The rest are either embarrassed or despairing. Whose polls are those? Are they trustworthy? It's hard to believe that 40% of the people are going to stay wackadoodly after the don is charged, goes to trial and he is convicted of a MULTIPLICITY of crimes. Unless of course they have been braindead for so long the brain is totally gone and cannot be resuscitated. A question ariseth from this discussion. Thank you for your reply and the graphic.

YOU ARE A HOOT Nanoose! That's a compliment. Your brain goes to so many places I enjoy. Keep it up. Those train problems I was never very good at figgering out. You brought in all the players..I'd just add that Access Hollywood Tape as the icing on the cake and include little donny doughboy. Where is HIS point of origin? East or west? If they leave for Russia on a boat leaving from Los Angeles and a boat leaving from New York which boat will get there first? Maybe I should ask. Maybe someone will know. I'd love more arithmetic math "problem" futurely Nanoose. They're such fun, don'tcha think?

You said the magic words tom..."Gene Wilder". I adored him. I miss him. SIGH. Thank you for your reply and the link. I hope he and Gilda Radner are having a great raucous fun time in the hereafter together wherever that may be. They were true originals than which there will be none other. :)

I have a dear friend whose internet social site moniker is OLD SCHOOL who graduated with a degree in Cognitive Science tom. He'd surely know about this effort justification idea. It's hard for me to believe that anyone can ACCIDENTALLY sell one's soul to the devil though. Are they brain dead during the transaction? Thank you for your reply and the link! :)

It isn't done accidentally---but we refuse to blame ourselves for doing it.  It is the final result of consequent ignorance, i.e., failing to ever learn how to evaluate situations and then make appropriate choices.

[A failure fostered by the incredibly stupid principle that all opinions---no matter how ridiculous---must be respected (i.e., are worthy of admiration and esteem).]

SAY WHAT? What principle is that? "...all opinions must be respected"? WHAT? Are you kidding me?

So Hitler's opinion that Jews must be exterminated should be respected?

Seriously? What blithering idiot could possibly think or believe that?
Consequent ignorance proliferates in politics. Pols promulgate it and hope to he** the "people" will keep buying it. Sadly enough of them do to enable/facilitate it being on the menu all pols rely on. "Keep them dumb so you can control manipulate them." There is no better example of that than what has happened to the Republican party. In my opinion. Dumb leading the dumber. Sheesh. Thank you for your reply tom!  :) This post was edited by RosieG at March 11, 2019 11:40 AM MDT

It's in the terms of service for this site.

We can talk about public figures like him and Trump with impunity---except for using "curse" words---but were Hitler be posting from beyond the grave, we would have to respect his opinions. This post was edited by tom jackson at March 12, 2019 5:33 AM MDT

Yes. That's riddikkalus. How do you "respect" an opinion that is based on racism bigotry fascism or LIES? Seriously? How? SIGH. Thank you for your reply tom and Happy Tuesday!  :)

When talking about the TOS here. It is simply a matter of not calling user names. Discuss the topic without making it personal. It is not hard to do. 

WHAT NAMES DID I CALL ANYONE? PLease show me what those names are. Is TRUMPICAN a bad name? I call trumpicans trumpicans because they are prodons protrump. Is being called PRODON a swear word a bad name? You accuse me but don't show an EXAMPLE. WHY? If you want me to change my ways you are going to have show me the error of my ways. I cannot read your mind. What names? Directed at what specific people? When? Show me the money. Where is the beef? Well?

No, Hilters posts would not be allowed according to the TOS here. 

3. Anything that’s illegal in Arizona, USA, is not permitted here at all, ever, under any circumstances. This includes things like bestiality, murder, rape, violence, incest, hate speech, and attacks of protected classes (race, religion, gender, etc.), but this list is not exhaustive.

Therein lies the problem.

You say "Hilters (sic) posts would not be allowed according to the TOS here."

Hitler was a human being---although arguable a severely damaged one---and yet, you have assumed that anything he posts would be against the TOS for this site.

So you would therefore delete any of his posts in which he was speaking about his love for the woman who gave him life---his mother?

Seems like you might have a preconceived notion about whether or not Hitler's posts might or might not violate the TOS.

:):):)

So, of course, you were talking about posts Hilter would make that are normal posts. We both know, the purpose is bringing "respecting Hilter's posts" was to imply that his racist, bigoted opinions would be allowed on this site simply because he was a registered user.  

".....but were Hitler be posting from beyond the grave, we would have to respect his opinions."

Now see, you are interpreting what people are thinking when you read an answer.

It's OK---in the 5+ years I've been on Q & A sites, I've only come across 2 people that actually impressed me as site moderators---the "super mod" on ask.com and "Rooster" on blurtit. 

And I haven't dealt with Just Asking frequently enough to have an opinion about her.

(I do know that you are an "internal client" of hers and I suspect that she would tend to construe in your favor.)

So when you send me a message like this: "If you have any questions about the moderation, feel free to discuss with JA. Thank you, m2c," I probably won't pursue it.

He is indeed that. Weak, cowardly, autocratic and sociopathic in the sense that he doesn't give a rat's a ** about anyone or anything but himself. All that's bad tied up in an overweight old uncharismatic rich man. It would be pathetic on its face if it were not for the shameful disgrace of a human being he is. One day he will get his just desserts..what he deserves. Till then the hope is that we can survive. Thank you for your reply ADDB!  :)