Discussion » Questions » Politics » Which is Worse

Which is Worse

Which do you think is worse.  Someone who has been a staunch supporter of Trump but now realizes they made a mistake in doing so, but continues to support him because they don't want to admit they were wrong or someone who supports him and sees absolutely nothing wrong with anything he has said or done.  Is one just as bad as the other?

Posted - October 22, 2016

Responses


  • 2758
    Clinton. Hillary Clinton and the intellectually/morally rotted people who support her are worse.
      October 22, 2016 8:02 PM MDT
    1

  • 2465
    I think you could skip going to the gym tomorrow, since you got more than enough exercise dodging this question.  

    I can't help but wonder though, if Trump gets elected, will the taxpayers have to foot the bill for this product:

      October 22, 2016 9:55 PM MDT
    1

  • 2758
    LOL!  Never (this week) have I been told off so elegantly.

    Uh, be that as it may, I didn't answer your question because you formulated it such that no alternative answer could be offered. You loaded it, IOW.  How? There is no way for a Trump supporter to answer the question without being 'bad' in some way.  The question ignores the potential that some--hell, most--people support Trump full well knowing his positions stink and not caring.  Almost every Trump supporter who has discussed the issue with me has been quite blunt: they know his position on the issues is awful; they know he's a misogynist; they know he appeals to the absolute worst in us and they know he's not the brightest crayon in the box. They do not care!

    Trump is not a part of the establishment.  To his supporters that's all that matters.  The statist quo MUST GO.

    Honest to pete I don't know why this is so hard to grok. This post was edited by Transquesta at October 23, 2016 4:09 AM MDT
      October 22, 2016 10:58 PM MDT
    1

  • 6988
    * Also works for people hanging around Crocodile Dundee.
      October 23, 2016 6:25 AM MDT
    1

  • 17261
    Wow, that was so much not answering the question. Lol.
      October 23, 2016 2:54 AM MDT
    1

  • 2758
    Guilty as charged, your honor...although I did take the time to explain WHY in a later post/response. :-)
      October 23, 2016 2:15 PM MDT
    0

  • 17261
    You could claim most political questions are loaded, even the ones using external sources. Yet the choice of source will be loaded by the poster. I usually stay out of obviously loaded questions if I don't accept to respond on them. Well, well... Have a lovely Sunday.
      October 23, 2016 2:18 PM MDT
    1

  • 2465
    You lucked out SH, Transquesta plead guilty without the need for a lengthy and might I say costly trial.  I will leave it in your capable hands to set punishment in proportion to the offense.
      October 24, 2016 12:48 AM MDT
    2

  • 17261
    I'm not for punishment as long members stay within the ToS. The exposing itself will have to do, from my side at least. 
      October 24, 2016 12:53 AM MDT
    1

  • 2758
    "Beat me!" said the masochist.
    "No!" said the sadist. 

    :-)
      October 24, 2016 1:15 AM MDT
    2

  • 17261
    Way too easy and shallow a way describing D/s. But that won't be to discuss inside the main/family room.
      October 24, 2016 1:31 AM MDT
    1

  • 2465
    He's asking for it!  Don't disappoint him.
      October 24, 2016 6:35 AM MDT
    1

  • 17261
    I am not one following the wishes of others blindly. Anyway, that would only be one if so which won't be Transquesta. He will have to stay disappointed if you are right. 
      October 24, 2016 7:47 AM MDT
    1

  • 2758
    Problem just doesn't appreciate your philosophical purity. L0L!
      October 24, 2016 12:45 PM MDT
    1

  • 17261
    Lol.
      October 24, 2016 3:08 PM MDT
    0

  • 2758
    I'm afraid you don't understand.  It's precisely BECAUSE I've asked for it that she must disappoint.  That's how this works. :-)
      October 24, 2016 12:43 PM MDT
    1

  • 17261
    Nah, more so that I already have said what I had on mind. There's no need extending it any more. ;-)
      October 24, 2016 3:07 PM MDT
    1

  • 2465
    Ahhh, I see now.  I was entranced with other aspects being dished out and they somehow shadowed the taste of D/s.
      October 24, 2016 6:54 PM MDT
    0

  • Although I may disagree with Trump supporters, people who fail to do what they believe is right disappoint me more than people who vote differently from me. So the dishonest one who won't own up to their mistake is worse to me. 
      October 22, 2016 8:02 PM MDT
    4

  • 2758
    Indeed. It would appear as if people of varied political stripe have one thing in common: a respect for consistency.

      October 22, 2016 8:21 PM MDT
    1

  • 3191
    I do not know any Trump supporters who fit either description.  The former would be working at odds to their desired outcome by doing so.  As to the latter, his supporters are by and large doing so despite the things he has said and done.
      October 22, 2016 11:11 PM MDT
    2

  • 2758
    Precisely!

    (Here's hoping his response to you is a bit more cordial. :-))
      October 22, 2016 11:13 PM MDT
    1

  • 2465
    Hmmmmm, I think I'm getting mixed messages here.

    Signed,

    The elegant YET uncordial, intellectually & morally rotted,



    ProblemCh1ld


    P.S. Hold on a second,  I may have spoken a bit hastily because I believe I've discovered a legal loophole. Since I don't support Clinton and since I wasn't planning on voting for her, it appears I need to edit my valediction to:

    The elegant & apparently uncordial,



    ProblemCh1ld


      October 23, 2016 7:54 AM MDT
    1

  • 2758
    You got spunk and rare wit, 'Child.'  I like that. :-)
      October 23, 2016 2:11 PM MDT
    1