My grandmother spent about a week in jail in the 1950s for suspicion of violating what were in those days known as “Blue Laws”.
Companion questions: https://answermug.com/forums/topic/123323/what-is-something-that-many-of-your-family-members-thought-you-k
A baby is a human being, not an “it”.
——
What sense does that make?
“Your baby is a boy.”
“However, she gave it the baby away . . . ”
“However, she gave it the child away . . . ”
“However, she gave it him or her away . . . ”
That’s correct. A baby is a human being, and human beings are not referred to as “it”. Animals and inanimate objects, sure, but people, no. Numerous people call babies “it”, yet do not do so when referring to older children nor to adults, so my question to them is what is the magical age or point in that baby‘s life where suddenly they stop using the word “it”?
~
Perhaps that makes sense to you, and that’s fine, you’re entitled to your own perspective. Personally, regardless of being even one minute old or at any other time throughout his or her life, I find it disrespectful and dismissive to call a baby “it”.
~
As if I stated at any point in time that the baby would or would not care.
Even so, since you broached it, I’ll bite. Regardless of the baby even being cognizant of it, there are other people involved also, people who are cognizant. For instance, based on your stance here so far, it appears to be inconsequential to you if someone calls a baby “it”, and for the sake of argument, let’s say the baby in question is your child. If you don’t mind your child being called “it”, yet I do mind my child being called “it”, then even if or when the baby doesn’t care, I do.
Just because a baby is unaware of something is not the determining factor in whether or not that thing is wrong.
Wow, we’re getting into the philosophical here.
~
Are extraterrestrials human? If not, then we’re talking about two distinctly separate concepts here.
~