Seems to me Paul Ryan has some s'plaining to do! Every statement someone makes is questionable. This one surely is. Isn't it?
"... negotiating foreign policy with them is an entirely different animal and THAT is illegal"
Although I don't think there has ever been anyone charged or convicted of that law. And it's doubtful it would stand up to a Constitutional challenge under the First Amendment.
It's actually a ridiculous law, when you think about it. It makes it illegal for a private citizen to negotiate on behalf of the US. No negotiator worth their pay is going to negotiate with anyone not authorized to fulfill the deal. LOL
He really didn't do anything most other candidates do ... tell foreign delegations what they plan to do IF elected.
And there is no evidence he negotiated on Obama's behalf, or claimed to.
The main difference is he lied about it.
If he had owned up and said ... "Yeah, I did. Every candidate does. So what?" ... nothing would happen. Because we WANT other nations to know what to expect, if a candidate gets elected.
Note - I'm not saying whether or not it should be illegal for candidates to meet with foreign leaders before they are actually elected. As I said, every candidate I know of ... for the last 30 years ... has either talked directly to foreign leaders, or broadcast their intentions so blatantly on the media everybody knew.
This post was edited by Walt O'Reagun at February 15, 2017 3:28 PM MSTEven if he didn't have Trump's authority to do so (yeah, right. I know) ... as a private citizen, he has a First Amendment Right to speak to anyone who agrees to speak with him. Multiple courts have upheld that as the implied Right of "Freedom of Association".
Obviously, the Russians believed he had authority from Candidate Trump or they wouldn't have wasted time on him - just like they won't take a call from you or I about international issues.
With a bit of luck, one of them will be the Donald's.