The people have a very long laundry list sometimes of those who WANT the job. They debate and debate and debate. Debates are generally DEBACLES and do not serve the candidates or the people well. If they did we wouldn't get a loser ever. We would ALWAYS choose the most SUPERB. When was the last time you voted FOR SUPERB rather than against the greater evil? Whose fault is that?
The smarta** insulter whose potshots get attention is not the one who will AUTOMATICALLY make the best president. Hotshot potshot hipshot alecks are never smart they are always hostile filled with grudge grundge enormous ego and one-liners. Shecky Greene? The "I don't get no respect" guy? Don Rickles the insulter guy? Think they'd make a good president? Why do you think the debate insulters attackers would?
There must be a better way. Anyone out there have the brains and impartiality to figure it out since we obviously can't do it because if we couldda we wouldda but we didn't so we can't?
