When she was asked if the Constitution made it legal for a president to delay an election for any reason she would not answer no. She bollexed it up with her set robotic reply to everything which was "I cannot answer a HYPOTHETICAL" She apparently does not understand the difference between HYPOTHETICAL and LITERAL. A simple answer was required which she refused to give. Do you know what that answer is?
The Constitution does not give the president a right to delay an election. If she doesn't know that why is she a candidate for justice on scotus?
Second even worse dumbfounding dumb broad dipstick nitwit halfwit reply to a simple question
Is it illegal to intimidate anyone who is voting at a poll location?
The answer is YES. It is illegal. There is a law specifically addressing that.
Her reply? She could answer any HYPOTHETICAL. It is not hypothetical. It was not hypothetical. So you can see she is already skilled at obfuscating obstinating obdurating like a pro. WOE is us if she is a scotus justice. Woe is us. Woe is us. Woe is us.
She is signed sealed delivered and owned by duck and his cabal of quacks. Another of his "best people" no doubt. To add to his infected swamp of anti science anti intellectuals. Obedient little woman. Rolls over for the big powerful men. No sweat. Predictable. Locked. Rigid. A sure thing.
