Active Now

Element 99
DannyPetti
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » How much credence do you give to anyone who accuses IN ADVANCE of an occurrence? Unless the accuser does the rigging?

How much credence do you give to anyone who accuses IN ADVANCE of an occurrence? Unless the accuser does the rigging?

J'ACCUSE!

An ancient ploy that is transparent.

Accusing others of your crimes is what people have always done since ancient times AS IF it actually puts the spotlight on "the other". It doesn't.

It simply telegraphs in advance the intention of the doer accuser who sets things up in such a way that he is always the victim the doee not the doer. Typical. Standard. Textbook ORDINARY. The MO of the guilty.

Why do it? Because it works, why else?

Some are born without an internal compass and need direction from others. They welcome being told what to think where to go what to do. It makes them feel that they BELONG to something greater than themselves.
They are beholden and grateful and loyal to the directors. BIG DADDY watches over them to guide them and limit them and direct them into the "good" ways of being thinking doing. Good being relative of course.

And so it goes. From ancient times to now and futurely. The masses will do whatever you tell them to do and believe whatever you tell them to believe. A given.

Fortunately not ALL homo saps are wired like that. The obeyers without question are DC. Without a direct connection to BIG DADDY they are helpless. But there are the AC folks who alternate. Flexibility and adaptability and sovereignty and independence are key. No BIG DADDY for them. They outgrew that need to remain a child. It's safer to stay back and absorb all you are given. That is the DC for ya. Without someone outside themselves applying the current there is nothing there. Empty inside until others fill them up.

Posted - November 16, 2020

Responses