The less than one year trials were documented I expect just as are ALL FDA trials documented.
I'd like to see which parts of which stages were shorted or even worse sped through/eliminated.
A timeline of when they began everything they did and when they came to the conclusion both vaccines were 95% effective with no harmful side effects.
Just available to review. Of course scientists would know what they were reviewing and the meaning more than I would. But I could certainly ascertain where short cuts were taken as they must have been to have been done so quickly.
Are you at all interested in this or do you take the word of the pharma companies? Why?
