Guess what else that FOOTOO FOOL who said "we didn't send him there to vote his conscience" also said?

And what happens when the rest of the constituents don't agree with what YOU want?

Then obviously...I was not a person who voted for that politician.  I do not expect a Dem to represent my positions on issues.  We disagree on them. 
If a Rep is voted in..I expect him to support the party platform. 

The only 2 Dems I even partially responsible for sending to DC was McCaskill. (The other was Bill Clinton) Because I voted Libaratian. We had the "legitimate rape will not result in pregancy" candidate running.  McCaskill did not represent me and I had no reason to think she would.  In hindsight, it is the only vote I regret in my voting history. This post was edited by my2cents at February 18, 2021 8:48 AM MST

So, in hindsight, you would have preferred to have the candidate who didn't believe legitimate rape would cause pregnancy representing you.  I guess he DID represent your thinking after all.

In hindsight, he would have been a better Sen than McCaskill. And the only thing his incorrect thinking would have done was ensure that any vote he took would have been on the prolife side. So yes, his policy position would in fact be the same as mine. 

Why am I not surprised at your answer.

You should not be.....it is about policy.  That is the only thing that matters in politics the rest is games.