Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » The newly discovered information is PROVABLE and TRUE but it is ruled inadmissible. How stupid is that?

The newly discovered information is PROVABLE and TRUE but it is ruled inadmissible. How stupid is that?

THEY say that introducing PROVABLY TRUE information to the jury will prejudice the case.

SINCE WHEN IS TRUTH THAT IS PROVEN PREJUDICIAL?

That is so ridiculous and absurd and insane but there it is. It the law of the land. The judge says what is allowed and what is not.

BLOCK TRUTH by all means so the guilty won'dtbe looked upon disfavorably.

ALLOW LIES of course. All lies are welcome. The country thrives and survives on LIES.

BUT TRUTH? OH MY GOD. BLOCK IT WHATEVER IT TAKES. America in all  hoary gory glory cannot handle THE TRUTH

In your country too? In all the elsewheres everywhere BLOCK TRUTH because it is prejudicial? SERIOUSLY?

Posted - April 16, 2021

Responses