Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Is diminished status/influence always a good tradeoff for autonomy? Why?

Is diminished status/influence always a good tradeoff for autonomy? Why?

.

Posted - July 13, 2016

Responses


  • oh, most definitely.

    because... introvert. i'd never give up my autonomy for fame or money. what good is it, if it drives you mad?

      July 13, 2016 5:04 PM MDT
    0

  • 113301

     I can't argue that m'dear.  I need mine too. I'm  also an  introvert. As a child I was painfully shy and I still  kinda am. I don't do well taking orders but I do very well following rules. Thank you for your reply lq and Happy Thursday to you! :)                                

      July 14, 2016 4:52 AM MDT
    0

  • you're welcome.

    i share your affinity for following rules,but not orders. =) we're awesome.

    thanks for for the Thursday wishes. happy Sat night/Sun morning... the rest of forever to you.

      July 16, 2016 10:58 PM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    Always is never a good term around me.

    Sometimes. 

      July 16, 2016 11:15 PM MDT
    0

  • 113301

    What a sweetheart you are lq! Thank you for the kind words m'dear and Happy Sunday to you!   :)

      July 17, 2016 2:27 AM MDT
    0

  • 113301

    Always works for me Sharonna so that's why I specifically chose it.. Thank you for your reply. Which sometimes? That means you're AC/DC . I'm not when it comes to autonomy. I don't need power or influence.  In fact I shy away from it. So I can always it foreverafter but I do understand that not eveyone is like me. :)

      July 17, 2016 2:29 AM MDT
    0

  • =)

      July 17, 2016 9:49 AM MDT
    0