Yep. THE Oliver North who was convicted of desstroying documents, accepting illegal gratuity and aiding in the obstruction of justice in the Iran-Contra gun sale. Subsequently those charges were vacated and reversed in 1991. Because the Oliver North was innocent? NO. Because his testimony was given under the promise of immunity and could not be used against him. But they were.So that's the why of the reversal. Guilty as charged. No matter how it was subsequently whitewashed.
So a convicted criminal who did all the crimes for which he was convicted is now "innocent"? Really? It "exonerates him" of engaging in criminal activity? Really? Immunity means you are guilty and are getting a pass if you fink on others. Otherwise why would you NEED immunity? Right? Just like the good old prez sez. Why would you take the fifth unless you are guilty? So when the good old prez takes the fifth he is admitting guilt. SIGH. What next?
