When you try to compare things that are completely unrelated you end up with a false equivalency. For example.
Comparing a randy medium old man who has consensual sex with an adult in a blue dress and then LIES about it to Congress versus
A very randy very old very Compulsive Congential LIAR who conspires/colludes with an enemy foreign government to sabotage/undermine the political campaign of a competitor and try to get DIRT on her.
Comparable you say? By what standard using what logic in what universe? One is sexually promiscuous and the other is undoubtedly treasonous.
And yet the "what about" folks bring that up as if it were comparable and more deplorable than what their guy has done is doing will do. I don't get it. Do you?
