When imaginary guy is criticized whom do his supporters criticize? They criticize the critics for daring to point out the activities in which the imaginary guy engages that are unsavory to them. That seems odd to me. Silence is golden when the imaginary guy engages in misdeeds among his supporters. Either silent assent or verbal support but NEVER ANY CONDEMNATION comes from them. They have to save their strength and ammunition for anyone who speaks out against him. Stacked deck? Blinders? Cherrypicking? What's going on? Why is the imaginary guy held in such high esteem that "they" will not tolerate his being criticized for anything? Above the law? Above punishment? Above being held accountable/responsible for the havoc he wreaks he is untouchable/invincible. Do "they" think he is PERFECT?
