Active Now

Element 99
Randy D
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Considering the source it makes perfect sense. Illogical of course but then remember where it comes from. What am I talking about?

Considering the source it makes perfect sense. Illogical of course but then remember where it comes from. What am I talking about?

When President Obama was SUPPOSED TO APPOINT A JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT Mitch McConnell obstructed him and prevented him from doing so.  The cockamamie wackadoodle excuse he gave was that they should wait for the results of the November election and let the people choose who should choose the Justice. Bullsh** rhetoric by obstructors of justice...literally.

But they have no problemo letting an unindicted co-conspirator facing many investigations and accusations of criminal and possibly treasonous acitivity including money laundering, conspiracy, collusion, choose whomever he wishes.

They opt for a crook's right to do what he wants when he wants how he wants anything and everything individually and collectively. But refuse to let a non-crook do what it is his legal right and what he is entitled to do. Does it make sense? Of course it does to the folks whose world consists only of ALTERNATIVE FACTS, a leader who is quite possibly both a crooked criminal and a traitor. With that they're good. They're fine They're cool. They're swell. They're up with it and down with it. Anything is fine with them as it concerns their leader. SIGH

Posted - September 4, 2018

Responses