In 2006 NASA shipped off into space an electronic thingy. It reached its destination January 1, 2019! How far did it travel? FOUR BILLION MILES! The farthest we have ever traveled in our galaxy.
It was the subject of the TV show NOVA. Pictures and everything. It took 13 years to go that far. No breakdowns. No errors. Can you imagine that? And through the years they kept in touch guiding it directing it adjusting it controlling it.
Now there are 100,000 - 200,000 galaxies theoretically supposedly allegedly. That is what we currently surmise, Our galaxy, the Milky way, is 100,000 light years in size. The galaxy known as M87 is 980,000 light years in size. Hercules A is 1.5 million light years in size. The largest we have discovered SO FAR is 4 million light years in size and it is called 1C 1101.
Is your mind boggled yet? Ever wonder about what's out there beyond that we know nothing about? What else is there out there somewhere? It is heady stuff to work on a project for 13 years before it is completed. Well it isn't actually completed yet. It will take many months for our electronic thingy to transmit all the info it has collected and is collecting. I think it takes something like 6 hours for the info to travel back to earth.
Anyone see the program?
Yes - the more we find out about the Universe, the greater and more complicated we realise it is.
We may never know how many galaxies there really are. Apart from perhaps some being obscured by nearer and larger galaxies, there must be a horizon nearly 15 000 000 000 light-years away. Since that number of years alone, is the calculated age of the Universe, light from anything beyond has not yet reached us, even if it is bright enough to be detectable when it does arrive.
Ultima Thule's real composition won't be known for some time yet, as you explain. It is probably a lump of frozen gases and dust (of various elements and/or minerals), possibly too, water ice.
I don't quite understand the remarks on News reports about it being as old as the Solar System, as if that makes it somehow different. I think it means the planets are probably coagulations of lumps like Ultima Thule - so millions of years younger. Or put another way, those fringe bits and pieces are remnants of the accretion disc of material debris that the Sun had acquired, like a huge flat cloud, that eventually became thick enough to condense into the planets. I've not yet heard any explanation.
What surprises me is that enough sunlight reaches it for it to be photographed, but it must be very dim and the probe's cameras extremely sensitive. If my very rounded-off sums are right, the intensity of the sun-light reaching this lonely little object is less than 1/200 of that reaching the Earth - but I welcome anyone who can do so, to verify or correct my arithmetic! I don't know how that compares to moonlight.
(That fraction is roughly the square of the ratio of the respective distances from the Sun, but to facilitate a literal pencil-on-old-envelope sum, I rounded the Earth-Sun distance to 92M miles, an integer multiple of 4. Besides, we don't know how rounded is that 4 000 000 000 miles we are quoted.)