Active Now

Malizz
Spunky
Zack
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Derelection of duty. What happens to derelicts who promise big and then renege?

Derelection of duty. What happens to derelicts who promise big and then renege?

Ya see little donny d derelected his duty from day one and to date. He oathed and then broke it on the same day. What should be done with the chief derelict  in your opinion and WHEN?

Posted - March 9, 2019

Responses


  • 46117


    It makes horse face very very angry.

    DID YOU SEE HER ALL DOLLED UP FOR HER TV APPEARANCES LATELY.  SHE REALLY THINKS SHE IS SOMETHING.  



      March 9, 2019 9:35 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    She is something Sharon. She called don AN IDIOT and all he said about her was that "everyone knows she is off the ranch" or off the farm or something. That was it. Ya know WHY? He is chickensh** that's why. He doesn't dare rant and rave and insult her. He knows his base LOVES her. What a whinya** scairdy cat twit. Yet he has millions who love him. Go figger! Thank you for your reply and the graphic. I think Annie has him by the short hairs!
      March 9, 2019 9:50 AM MST
    0

  • 7807
    As far as an old white rich man, absolutely nothing will happen to him. As far as everybody else, everything will happen to them.
      March 9, 2019 9:37 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    You have no idea idea how much I wish I could challenge you Zack. Or mebbe ya do! Every word you said is true because his base believes he is the second coming of Jesus. How they reconcile the evil that he does/sez/is I have no idea. But they find a way to do it so that they make themselves feel REAL GOOD! REAL SELF-RIGHTEOUS!  REAL GODLY. Sigh. Thank you for your reply and Happy Saturday to thy!  :)
      March 9, 2019 9:54 AM MST
    1

  • 46117

    Could Trump Go to Prison Once He’s Out of Office?

    Filings made Friday by the special counsel’s office and the Southern District of New York could spell trouble for a civilian Trump

    President Donald Trump in Gulfport, Miss., Nov. 26, 2018.

    President Donald Trump in Gulfport, Miss., Nov. 26, 2018.

    Alex Brandon/AP/Shutterstock

    On Friday evening, both Special Counsel Robert Mueller and prosecutors for the Southern District of New York filed memos offering sentence recommendations for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s embattled former attorney who has been a focal point for investigations spanning both offices. The memos were pretty damning for Cohen’s former boss. Mueller wrote that Trump told Cohen to reach out to the Russian government in late 2015, and that he pursued a lucrative real estate deal that would have likely required the cooperation of the Kremlin well into the 2016 campaign. The SDNY wrote that Trump directed Cohen to commit felony campaign finance violations prior to the 2016 election. Trump didn’t seem to think any of this was that big of a deal. “Totally clears the President,” he tweeted shortly after the filings were made. “Thank you!” 

    On Monday morning, Trump continued to claim he did nothing wrong while also raising the possibility that the president of the United States doesn’t know how to spell “smoking.”

    Donald J. Trump
     
    @realDonaldTrump
     “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,...

    Donald J. Trump
     
    @realDonaldTrump
     
     

    ....which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama’s - but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine. Lawyer’s liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced. WITCH HUNT!

     
    65.2K people are talking about this 

    The “simple private transaction” to which the president is referring is a hush money payment of $130,000 given to porn star Stormy Daniels, with whom Trump allegedly had an affair. The payment was made by Cohen through a shell company, and, given that it came in October 2016, was almost certainly made to prevent news of the alleged affair from influencing the election. A separate payment was made in August to acquire the rights to former Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal’s story about her alleged affair with Trump. Prosecutors have argued that because Cohen was involved in campaign matters, the payments — which the SDNY wrote on Friday were made with “the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election” — constituted campaign contributions. “Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments,” the filing read. “In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.”

    “Individual-1” is, of course, Donald Trump, and directing Cohen to make the illegal payments to Daniels and McDougal for the purposes of influencing the election would indeed constitute a felony, regardless of how inconvenient this may be for the president. This goes without mentioning a host of other unknown crimes investigators could be attempting to tie to the president. Contrary to Trump’s tweets Monday morning, these investigators prying into the president’s various pre-election dealings are not “Dems.” As George Conway, the attorney and husband of Trump counsel Kellyanne Conway, pointed out on Twitter, “the criminal campaign-finance violations were found by professional line prosecutors in a Republican-controlled United States Department of Justice.” Conway added that “it looks like a pretty good case.”

    The strength of this case has led to renewed calls for Trump’s impeachment. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, the incoming chair of the House Judiciary Committee, said on Sunday that if it is proven that Trump directed Cohen to commit the campaign finance violations in question, it “would be impeachable” and that “even though they were committed before the president became president, they were committed in the service of fraudulently obtaining the office.” Though Democrats will take over the House of Representatives in January, a majority of Senate Republicans would need to sign off on removing the president from office, which isn’t likely to happen minus one hell of a “smocking gun.”

    This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at March 10, 2019 3:51 AM MDT
      March 9, 2019 9:55 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    That is why he and his evil thugs will INSURE that he "wins" in 2020. It will buy him another 4 years. That is  if he is still there. Once out of office he is red meat and unprotected. He is a coward. He has lived his entire life b eing cowered and cowardly. He requires others to "protect" him because he is a physical intellectual emotional spiritual COWARD. We will see how Russia and Saudi Arabia plan to steal another election for him. Stay tunes. Thank you for your thoughtful and informative reply Sharon.
      March 10, 2019 3:54 AM MDT
    0

  • 34966
    No, he has done what he promised or has tried and the Congress/Courts have stood in the way. 

    If he has done nothing....the left would not hate him so much.  


    What happens when you fail to keep up your end...Ask "Read my lips, No new taxes" Bush's family. 
      March 9, 2019 9:58 AM MST
    1