I guess that depends on how involved you are with the "project".
I know internal combustion engines work. I have no idea the difference between a gas and diesel engine, other than the fuel. But then again, I'm just a driver - not a mechanic.
If a mechanic couldn't tell the difference, they probably aren't a very good mechanic. They know how the engine works ... but they don't need to know why gas/diesel combusts.
Someone designing a new fuel additive would need to know why gas/diesel combusts ... in order to ensure their chemical doesn't prevent that.
Nope ... I don't know much about it. I've heard it would allow quantum computers to connect over any distance. I've heard they proved it by altering an atom on Earth and a linked one altered the same way in orbit, when they did so.
But it's all "magic" to me. (Clarke's Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable frommagic.)
I'm with you m'dear! "Magical mystical" about covers it. I saw a program about it on the Science Channel awhile back. It was "explained" by showing possible invisible connectors linking many things over millions of miles. Is that "Clarke's Third Law" real Walt? I love it! I guess I can Google it. The reason I love scifi so is precisely because of its imaginative creative inventive nature. Quantum physics is like that too. Sometimes the physicists will tell you they don't why it works or how it works. All they know is that it works. They seek to find the how and why. It is never boring for sure. Thank you for your helpful reply. It's good that we don't have to know how or why to appreciate isn't it?
My favorite characters of any science fiction were the Technomages (Babylon5). They used technology so advanced, they appeared to be magicians - even to highly technical civilizations. But it was never addressed where their technology came from.
In StarWars, fans debate whether or not the "force" is actually "lost" technology. Some fans claim the midichlorians are actually what we call nano-tech, and not living creatures.