Active Now

my2cents
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » You approve of the release of a transcript of a phone conversation you had and someone calls it HEARSAY! How is that not calling you a LIAR?

You approve of the release of a transcript of a phone conversation you had and someone calls it HEARSAY! How is that not calling you a LIAR?

Posted - September 30, 2019

Responses


  • 7800
    Rosie. Try not to figure this all out. You'll end up hurting yourself. There is no logic in how any of these Chump minions think.
      September 30, 2019 9:46 AM MDT
    1

  • 113301
    Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Thanks! I needed that Zack! Seriously. It's impossible to be intense when you're giggling. You're my first giggle of the day and I sincerely appreciate it. You know I didn't realize my shoulders were all hunched up and tight until I started laughing. Boy laughter is the best medicine. So is a good eagle eye of a pal who knows what to say when! Happy Monday! :)
      September 30, 2019 9:52 AM MDT
    1

  • 34834
    The transcript is not hearsay. 

    The false accusations in the whistleblower report is hearsay.  And up until Aug 2019 it would have been through out by the IG immediately because of it.
      September 30, 2019 9:49 AM MDT
    0

  • 113301
    THERE ARE TWELVE WITNESSES SOME OF WHOM WILL TESTIFY. THE TRANSCRIPT IS THE BASIS OF IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS. YOU JUST SAID IT IS NOT HEARSAY. SO WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
      September 30, 2019 9:55 AM MDT
    0

  • 34834
    The whistleblower is hearsay....that is the point. 
      September 30, 2019 12:36 PM MDT
    0

  • 7280
    The whistleblower reported what Trump did.  Trump released the summary of the call and that confirmed what the whistleblower said.

    The summary details Trump's impeachable offenses and stands on its own.

    The whistleblower did his job---you can't unring a bell, and you can't "unblow" a whistle.
      September 30, 2019 1:08 PM MDT
    1

  • 7280
    The transcript confirms what the whistleblower wrote.
      September 30, 2019 1:09 PM MDT
    1

  • 5391
    Someone still hasn’t grasped that a complaint is not testimony, does not fit the same criteria, and has since been corroborated by evidence.
    Parroting WH talking points. Might we imagine that will ever change? 

    Then we have a moronic, hypocrite of a President, tyrannically demanding that the rule of law be discarded to enable him to face his accuser; yet 22 women who accuse Agent Orange of sexual misconduct, not shielded by Whistleblower anonymity, don’t merit the same consideration.

    This post was edited by Don Barzini at October 1, 2019 9:14 AM MDT
      September 30, 2019 7:46 PM MDT
    1

  • 7280
    "Agent Orange"---good one.
      October 1, 2019 9:14 AM MDT
    0