The mike of pompousa** said that "not once did McKinley say a thing to me about it". The it being what I don't know.
However UNDER OATH McKinley said he went to the mike of pompousa** THREE TIMES and told him about "it".
UNDER OATH versus a pompousa** WHO SERVICES A COMPULSIVE LIAR AND GETS ALONG SO SWELL WITH HIM?
Whom do you believe? The mike of most pompousa** or the testifier UNDER OATH?
