The Whistleblower detailed what was told to him/her. Second hand info.
HOWEVER multiples of participants have TESTIFIED AND VERIFIED UNDER OATH that everything the Whistleblower blew is true. What do "they" want to do the Whistleblower for a telling a CONFIRMED AND TESTIFIED TO UNDER OATH truth? More stupid dumbs can't figger their way out of a paper bag if you give them scissors and a photo of how to use them. Are the stupid dumbs really gonna prevail?
