A nameless pol suggests that Clinton's bodyguards should disarm and said "let's see what happens to her". Is that something with which you agree and of which you approve? Why?

I believe any one (especially politicians) who think we should enact gun control or believe the 2nd amendment should be reinterpreted or overturned.... should not have armed security. Just like the average citizen would be if the has their way with our 2nd amendment rights.
To say I cannot have a gun to defend me and mine while they have a person(s) with a firearm to defend them and theirs is quite hypothetical.

I'm still trying to figure out what this has to do with being elected POTUS.....

Absolutely.... Hey, let's just do away with the Secret Service completely ! What could possibly happen ....LMAO.

true.

Permalink Reply by RiverRat 10 minutes ago
Delete
I think all politicians should be disarmed of their bodyguards and security. They should all live in fear of the citizenry dragging them to the gallows when they screw us over.

The Secret Service is there to protect the lives of prez candidates.  Trump consistently accuses Hillary of planning to do away with the second amendment. His point here is that if she dislikes guns so much why does she allow the Secret Service to carry them? So he suggests that they disarm. Which leaves her life at risk. That has EVERYTHING to do with the election of POTUS Al. She does not plan to upend the Constitution. That is just another of the Trump lies he tells to pander to the gun folks who also believe that lie. Anything derived from a lie is also a lie is it not? Did I answer your implied question? Do you see the connection now?   :(

That would make them setting ducks.  I would not support that RR. Thank you for your reply and Happy Sunday! :)

I"d rather do away with those who wish harm to befall prez candidates. I could support that in a heartbeat! Thank you for your reply Al!  :)

They should be sitting ducks. A good politician is one who lives in constant fear of their constituents. As it is now they have very little to fear and live in a safe place above us, when they should be below us.

We would all love to do away with those who wish harm to befall prez candidates AND the rest of us as well.

You know that isn't true m2c. When you say "we would ALL love to do away with those who wish harm to befall prez candidates...." you KNOW that isn't true. But you say it anyway. I believe YOU don't wish harm to befall either of them. But some of your like-minded folks do wish harm to befall Hillary because they HATE her and you KNOW that!  Saying it isn't so doesn't make it so . I'm surprised that no  armed white supremacists nationalists for whom Trump is their hero hasn't tried it yet. Just wait. Just my opinion of course. I would like to think you are correct in your assessment. I don't. I think you are incorrect. Thank you for your reply and Happy Wednesday to thee! ")

 SET. To put something or someone in a  particular place. To place in a particular position or posture.

SETTING. The act of a person or thing that sets

 I doubt that the Secret Service would be sitting RR.