Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » More implications. If you KNOW who the guilty party is but don't arrest him because you don't want to be accused of profiling are you to blame for whatever he does?

More implications. If you KNOW who the guilty party is but don't arrest him because you don't want to be accused of profiling are you to blame for whatever he does?

A prez wannabe implied that. He said the NYC police knew who was guilty but were afraid to do anything about it. Do you agree with the always-opinionated usually wrong prez wannabe?

Posted - September 20, 2016

Responses


  • 691

    That is probably not what was implied but to address your question there is the concept of "malicious compliance" which is that subordinates will follow rules even when known that those rules will lead to failure as a way of showing the fault with the rules. This concept applies to society too where people will do something in line with some current trend of thinking in society to show it can fail, and sometimes it is done halfway and this is the worse. Halfway is when people walk by a lost child because they are afraid to approach and help out of fear of being accused of being a pedophile, or when people don't do anything about the behavior of someone out of fear of being accused of being racist or islamaphobic.

      September 20, 2016 7:32 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907

    Hello S:

    Where, you ask??  Right here.  I'll give you the Readers Digest version:  “Our local police, they know a lot of who these people are. They are afraid to do anything about it because they don’t want to be accused of profiling…”

    excon

      September 20, 2016 7:45 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907

    Hello IT:

    He didn't IMPLY anything..  He SAID it, straight out..  Read about it HERE.  Here's the short version:  “Our local police, they know a lot of who these people are. They are afraid to do anything about it because they don’t want to be accused of profiling…”

    excon

      September 20, 2016 7:47 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907

    Hello Rosie:

    So, Trump hates the police too??  Who knew?

    excon

      September 20, 2016 7:50 AM MDT
    0

  • 214

    Rosie implied in her question that Trump accused the police of knowing who did the bombing but refused to arrest them. That is exactly what I replied to. And Trump said the police know who a lot of these people are, but don't do anything for fear of being accused of profiling. Trump is correct, as I said in my response. The PC left have made it impossible to do the job!

      September 20, 2016 7:59 AM MDT
    0

  • 214

    Criticizing the POLICIES put in place by the PC left does not mean Trump hates the police. He hates the PC policy of the left-wingers. And he is right!

      September 20, 2016 8:01 AM MDT
    0

  • 214

    And Trump is right! Just as IT said, they are fearful of being accused of being racist or islamaphobic, thanks to the PC Left!

      September 20, 2016 8:06 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907

    Hello again, S:

    I'm NOT a cop..  But, IF I was, and I KNEW a person who was gonna KILL Americans, I would NEVER, NEVER, EVER let that happen.  Fire me if you will, but I would NOT stand by and watch people DIE..  I just WOULDN'T.. 

    To THINK that cops WOULD, says you don't like 'em much either..

    excon

      September 20, 2016 8:10 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    How does Trump know what the New York City police knew or were thinking?

      September 20, 2016 8:24 AM MDT
    0

  • 3934

    If Trump is saying that the NY/NJ-area police KNEW Ahmad Khan Rahami was going to commit bombings, but did nothing to intervene, then he is severely disrespecting their competence and/or moral character.

    But, of course, we know that's not what this is about. Ahmad Khan Rahami is a F***ING HADJI, and all Jews...er, F***ING HADJIS are guilty by association in the bigoted minds of Trump's deplorable supporters.

      September 20, 2016 8:34 AM MDT
    0

  • 113301

    Sadly yes. Mahalo for your reply OS! :)

      September 20, 2016 10:58 AM MDT
    0

  • 113301

    Yeah. Well he is all over the place all the time. When you have normal diarrhea you get rid of tons of sh** conventionally in the toilet! He has diarrhea of the mouth so whaddya expect? The doofus doesn't even realize it when he insults people. His worshippers don't  care . What a fine mess we're in Ollie! :( Thank you for your reply! :)

      September 20, 2016 11:04 AM MDT
    0

  • 214

    Where did the 'prez wannabe' imply that? He did say that, according to the PC policies, we are not allowed to profile. I can't find where he said that the police KNEW who the guilty party was but didn't arrest him, when in actuality they did track him down. You ARE implying an 'after-the-fact' scenario in you statement. I seem to recall a neighbor in San Bernardino who said she saw suspicious activities at the Farook home, but feared reporting it would label her as Islamophobic. We have the case of the Fort Hood murderer, who his superiors were concerned about, but chose to not say anything and instead promote him and move him from base to base. That is what he his referring to!

      September 20, 2016 6:45 AM MDT
    0