How does that make any sense?
INSISTS he is completely innocent. Has dozens of peeps who insist he is completely innocent. When given the chance to let them prove his innocence in court under oath providing documents that would attest to that support he FORBIDS IT!
Something doesn't compute here. He and they are totally oblivious to it. We who observe are extremely sensitive to and aware of it. The difference between us and them is what exactly?
When you can PROVE something you do don't you? WHY DON"T HE? WHY DIDN'T HE? WHY WOULDN'T HE? WHY COULDN'T HE?
Could it be that he isn't innocent, has no proof, cannot trust his peeps to lie for him under oath? That would mean he is lying wouldn't it? Lying. Him? Lying? Oh dear. The sky is falling.