Active Now

Danilo_G
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Is it possible for a GENTLEMAN or GENTLEWOMAN to fight "by the rules" when the opponent is a thug who doesn't? HOW?

Is it possible for a GENTLEMAN or GENTLEWOMAN to fight "by the rules" when the opponent is a thug who doesn't? HOW?

How can one who doesn't LIE or CHEAT  possibly win against "the other" who always lies and always cheats? Just a pie-in-the sky fantasy or a reality that is within one's reach if the reach extends long enough?

Posted - March 6, 2020

Responses


  • 10780

    Playing by the rules - viable or fantasy

    Cheating and lying have nearly become the norm in this world.  In fact many times it's even expected (assumed).  Cheating to win a game/contest, lying to get a job or to get ahead.   It's gotten so bad that somethat many say "if you can't beat 'em, then join 'em".  A few say, "why even bother vying?"  The result - cheaters and liars not only win but they prosper).  What many fail to see is that not only do cheaters and liars win the "game" (contest), but they also win converts.  "Everybody's doing it, so why shouldn't I?"  The more who do it, the easier it is to do.  Even those who morals many times sacrifice them just to get anywhere (or so they tell themselves).  Justifying bad behavior is getting easier and easier.  If those we esteem cheat and lie (ie. movie stars, sports players, bosses, government officials), then why shouldn't we?  Deflating a game ball, using steroids, slandering a rival, exaggerating our heritage, bribing officials in order to get preferential treatment ... the list goes on and on.  

    Sticking to one's scruples is hard and is getting harder by the day.  Immorality goes up while morality goes down.  Cheaters and liars permeate all levels of our government.  They fester in our schools.  They surround us at our jobs (employees and customers).  It's gotten so bad that when a person actually shows they have scruples/morals,they stand out like a sore thumb.  While those who reuse to chat and lie may not get far in this world, they are noticed.  Others see them, sometimes even copy them.  And that's a win.

      March 6, 2020 1:02 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    :( SIGH. Thank you for your thoughtful TRUTHFUL and very very very sad reply Shuhak. It is disheartening to know that "cheaters never prosper" is bullsh**. They're the only ones who do and do so very bigly. What's even worse is they are cheered admired and even sometimes elected president. I sometimes wonder if the world I knew when I was younger was real or just a fantasy? As I've aged my "vision" has finally caught up to the way things are. Is that the ways things ALWAYS WERE and I just was not astute enough to realize it? Happy Saturday. Newsome enacted a STATE OF EMERGENCY for our state. I'm not exactly sure what that means. Are you? I guess we'll find out! :)
      March 7, 2020 2:07 AM MST
    1

  • 10780
    Declaring a state of emergency not only opens up the pipeline to receive aid from the government (FEMA), but it gives officials the ability to enact or suspend certain laws/ordinances if necessary to get the situation under control.  
    That's why you see states, counties, and even cities declare states of emergencies after things such as fires, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, and such.
      March 7, 2020 10:03 AM MST
    0

  • 7280
    Sometimes it is more expedient to be direct when seeking a specific result:

    https://youtu.be/ua_TZ84hmEA


      March 6, 2020 3:33 PM MST
    2

  • 113301
    We always have choices. I can say I WANT a piece of that pie you just baked OR I can say "something smells wonderful" and have the pie baker OFFER me something rather than have me DEMAND it. Similarly sometimes we want to see who reacts to implication analogy metaphor. Why? I honestly don't know why but I am purposely vague at times to see what others will do with it. Different strokes. Thank you for your reply tom and Happy Saturday. Have I been direct enough?
      March 7, 2020 2:09 AM MST
    0

  • 7280
    I'm guessing that you didn't click on my link....(Never bring a knife to a gun fight.)

    I like the legal concept of being inherently authorized to respond to force with an equivalent appropriate force. This post was edited by tom jackson at March 8, 2020 12:03 PM MDT
      March 8, 2020 12:00 PM MDT
    0