So this TARA dame may have been attacked sexually BIGLY. Why did she not sue and make a big stink out of it right then? She sucks whether it's true or false. She sucks bigtime. If she didn't follow through when it happened what is her excuse reason rationalization justification for doing it now? Anyone wanna comment on this?
I have been lucky. Never been sexually assaulted. You can bet you a**if I had been I would have squealed like a stuck pig RIGHT THEN and kept at it and kept at it and kept at it. I wouldn't have waited. BUT say I chose to say nothing. I sure as he** WOULD NOT have talked about it 27 years later. Why? Because some folks would be asking the same questions I'm asking and make me look like a dam* fool which is exactly what she is.
If true she's a dam* fool for NOT following out RIGHT THEN TO THE END no matter how long it took
If untrue she's a dam* fool for making it up or exaggerating for whatever reason.
In either case she is dam* fool one way or the other. I don't care if she's a democrat or a republican or became gay or is celibate. She is a dam* fool for waiting to replay the stink or a dam* fool for lying. Dam* fool..
From Larry King Live:
"San Luis Obispo, California, hello," King begins.
"Yes, hello. I’m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him," the caller says.
"In other words, she had a story to tell but, out of respect for the person she worked for, she didn’t tell it?" King inquires.
