If Trump were caught in the act of raping a child would his worshipping adorers abandon him or defend him and blame the child?

LOL before I read your comment I said that same exact thing. The girl came out way later and said that she can't even have children after what that guy did to her. She was in a COMA for 5 days and the court still found him not guilty. Hillary had to pull some strings and I read the original court transcripts. Hillary did drag that girl through the mud.

In the 1970s it was still legal to question a woman's background. What was she wearing when she was raped? Was she drinking? Now they can't do that. Interesting enough though I've brought up this same thing before and dems say "nah she would have been fired" but those same people will say the court is biased when convicting people of color.

That's why I'm not a democrat anymore.

I belong to neither party. I just vote for who's policies I like best.  She is a very disgusting woman and she should be in jail. 

Prison.

Yeah that's what I meant. :) This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at October 11, 2016 7:26 PM MDT

I know.  Most people don't make the distinction.  I'm handicapped there.  :)

Some don't even know the difference. :)

I watched the video where Hillary was laughing about all of this..... Disgusting!! 

Do you have a link?  Is it a complete conversation about the case and the client?

I'm on my phone right now and it's hard to copy paste.  Go to YouTube and put Hillary laughs about rapist in the search and it will bring it up. 

I got the link and listened.  My comments are down below.  Thanks!

There is video. This should be a link https://youtu.be/e2f13f2awK4
Hillary says he had the guy take a polygraph then laughs about how he passed it and said that's why she doesn't trust the polygraph test.  She also laughed about bringing someone from new york to prevent the miscarriage of justice which is a joke of course because she knows the man is guilty and what she is doing is causing the miscarriage of justice.

The snopes page is very deceptive because the picture they show as false are all true at their core. Hillary said she would defend the man as a favor to the prosecutor. Those are her own words and she did not say she was forced to take the case and of course no lawyer is having a gun put to their head to take a case.

Hillary did say to the judge exactly the following "I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing … [and] that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body."

The rapist was freed serving only the time he had already been in custody waiting for the trial to finish which I think was 2 months. In 1980 the interview did clearly show hillary knew the rapist was guilty (there was even blood and semen evidence) and she did laugh twice about his guilt and getting him freed.

I will check it out.  I don't doubt she was acting like a typical lawyer.  I cannot imagine what that young woman went through.  

Thanks for the link.

My honest take on the conversation?  She is making fun of the guy that was doing the forensic testing and the absurdity of how there wasn't going to be evidence to put this man away.  Of course she used it to get him off.  Defense lawyers are paid to do that.  

Do I like the fact this rapist hardly got punished?  Hell no!  I am sure most of us have sat in a courtroom as we watched a defense lawyer do what they can to dispute EVIDENCE.  Unfortunately, the prosecutor could not get this scumbag on circumstantial evidence.  

I would be enraged as a mother if the evidence like that was lost.

People are forgetting that Hillary on the tape also shortly after she was laughing about it actually said the worst part was that the prosecutor had actual evidence. So they KNEW like 100% that the guy was guilty. You know what that evidence was right? It was the underwear by the rapist that had gotten thrown out of court because Hillary took it for "independent testing" and if anyone wants the proof I'm sure I can go back to my source if anyone is curious. She had to pull a lot of strings and it was a major piece of evidence that was suddenly not usable when Hillary had it independently tested....

That's not all the VICTIM herself (Kathy I don't remember her last name but she has a twitter for social media) came out and said that Hillary had lied about her.. there was evidence by the HOSPITAL that she was a VIRGIN before it happened but because Hillary told the court that she had "heard" through some mysterious witnesses that were never brought in court that the little girl had rape fantasies and liked older men. The victim herself said that was a lie.

She can't even have children because of what happened.

To be honest I think having anything "independently tested" is suspect at best. Who does that? An UNBIASED party should always be responsible for examining the evidence.. in the late 1970s though obviously that wasn't the case.

Hillary was definitely in lawyer mode back then and this is not a person I probably would have liked on a personal level, given how brutal this case was.  I don't want to sound like I am excusing her, just explaining what defense lawyers do.  I think they have to have some sort of dark humor to cope with the job they are doing, kinda like homicide detectives or funeral directors.  I often wonder how defense lawyers for any violent criminal do their job.

I can only hope that when she became a mother herself, she took a good hard look at who she was and evolved from there.  

In the end, I have to decide who is more qualified to lead this country and this will be the first election where I feel very let down by both candidates.

I would never think you are excusing her. I always write these comments in regards to Hillary simply because as long as a double standard exists between Hillary and Trump.. I'll continue exposing her. As long as democrats continue to ignore her history I'll continue writing about her.

Not to mention the girl who accused Trump of raping her when she was 13... one of her sponsors is the ex producer of the Jerry Springer show. Yeah that's real legit since that show basically is all about exploiting people. "Mary had 13 kids with her brother" and her family doesn't know... will they forgiver her!?! ....basically sums up the entire plot of the show.

"I'm sorry YOU are NOT the father" (the audience *gasps!) LOLOLOLOLOL.

"This time around, Johnson had a team of supporters behind her—a motley crew that included anti-abortion conservative donor Steve Baer and a man who calls himself “Al Taylor,” a mysterious foul-mouthed ex-producer of The Jerry Springer Show, the two unified by one common passion: a blinding hatred for Donald Trump.

For a time, it seemed like a perfect marriage between a #NeverTrump Republican with money to spend and a penniless woman and her handler who allegedly had the ammunition to sink the Republican nominee.But in less than a month, the strange alliance has ended.Baer and Taylor, both eccentric in their own right, have turned on each other in a war of escalating all-caps emails. Baer now claims he is withholding additional financial support for Johnson.

He and Taylor are threatening to sue one another. And Baer’s antics—which include delivering an unpixelated tape, of a woman he claims to be Katie Johnson, to GOP presidential hopefuls and House Speaker Paul Ryan—allegedly brought the FBI and the police to his door.Far from derailing the Trump train, Katie Johnson and her supporters seem to be in an out-of-control clown car whose wheels just came off."

About a week after Johnson filed the California suit, Taylor says Steve Baer texted the burner phone used to file the complaint, offering his “no strings attached” help—assistance which came, both men said, in the form of cash.

Though a stranger to Taylor and Johnson, Baer was well known in conservative circles as a professional rabble rouser who delighted in taking aim at Republicans whom he thinks are less conservative than his Grand Old Party deserves.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/21/trump-rape-accusers-turn-on-each-other.html

Snopes is biased to the left.  It has become obvious in the last year.  This post was edited by Thriftymaid at October 12, 2016 3:41 PM MDT

Fair enough with Snopes.com.  I always thought it was sort of in the middle, but I sure you could be right.

I still listened to the recording ITpro provided and came to my own conclusion above.

PeaPod, I always thought that as well. I've learned that Thrifty is correct.