Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » HYPOCRISY! The Trump campaign vilified Hillary for attacking her husband's accusers. Phony baloney two-faced huypocrites. Aren't they?
RosieG

HYPOCRISY! The Trump campaign vilified Hillary for attacking her husband's accusers. Phony baloney two-faced huypocrites. Aren't they?

Trump and his campaign staff are doing the very same thing to their accusers. And they think it will work. They think they are ever so clever. They think we the people are so obtuse and will believe whatever they tell us. Now why would they EVER think that? Because we ARE?

Posted - October 13, 2016
Tags : None

Responses


  • 691
    Did you forget how the trump campaign only went after hillary for attacking rape victims after hillary campaign started going after trump for treatment of women? Why did you not recognize hillary as phoney two-faced hypocrite then? She has even told the bankers she works for that she is two faced.
      October 13, 2016 11:33 AM MDT
    2

  • 46117
    Someone sure likes Trump.  How embarrassed I am for you.
      October 13, 2016 11:34 AM MDT
    0

  • 2500
    The REAL hypocrites are the ones that attack Trump for alleged transgressions while giving a free pass to the likes of Bill Clinton, Anthony Wiener, Wilbur Mills, Ted Kennedy, Daniel Inouye, Barney Frank, Gary Hart, Mel Reynolds; the list doesn't end. (And Reynolds was actually CONVICTED of 12 counts of sexual assault of a 16-year old. "Lucky" thing for him that Bill Clinton, the Patron Saint of Pedophilia, "pardoned" him . . . ).

    So if it wasn't for double standards liberals would have no standards at all.
      October 13, 2016 12:07 PM MDT
    2

  • 46117
    Oh yes, thank you, Red Pepper with Salt,  for clarifying that. It is all clear now that you have enlightened us.  Do you ever read what you actually write? This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at October 14, 2016 5:19 AM MDT
      October 13, 2016 3:39 PM MDT
    1

  • 2500
    You're so funny when you're trying to make a credible argument, and failing miserably . . . thanks for the laugh! This post was edited by Salt and Red Pepper at October 14, 2016 9:23 AM MDT
      October 14, 2016 9:10 AM MDT
    0

  • You know Salt, if you were to take the aggression and attacks out of most of your comments, sometimes you do bring up good points, do you not think that immediately puts the other person in a defensive position? What's the use then?  Is it just the personal satisfaction of telling somebody off?
      October 16, 2016 2:58 AM MDT
    0

  • Calling someone a liar is not an attack, it's a defence. As always you have no sense of proportion or perspective.

    Hillary tried to make those women fear for their lives. She even had Katherine Willey's cat killed as an intimidation tactic. It just disappeared and Willey found a cat skull on her doorstep a while later. Tires were slashed. Bullets were left on the front seats of cars. Now that's an attack. This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at October 14, 2016 8:47 AM MDT
      October 13, 2016 2:36 PM MDT
    2

  • 17258
    Oh. Now I see why I have to take whatever you say for nothing but the truth. No speculation, no conspiracy theorist, nothing but the truth... Hillary had Katherine's cat killed as an intimidating tactic. Wow... You should be careful, you might know too much, and Hillary will get after you... She is that dangerous, you know? #sarcasm 
      October 14, 2016 4:32 AM MDT
    0

  • It's not a conspiracy theory. It's the direct testimony of Kathleen Willey. (It's actually the Clintons that allege "a vast right wing conspiracy" trying to undermine them with malicious allegations.)

    You don't have to do anything. You can believe what you will.  Everything you ever say to me is always irrelevant to the topic. This about whether Trump is a hypocrite. The answer is no regardless of whether Willey's accusations are true or not. To be a hypocrite he would have to be guilty of intimidation. Calling someone a liar is not intimidation. This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at October 14, 2016 8:48 AM MDT
      October 14, 2016 5:19 AM MDT
    2

  • 17258
    As long as you believe in the nonsense you fabricate yourself... Smh.
      October 14, 2016 5:28 AM MDT
    0

  • 35910
    They also after asking her how her cat was and about her tires, asked how her kids (by name) were doing. And told her she just was not getting it.
      October 14, 2016 6:14 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907
    Hello my:

    Remember that thing about the Secret Service ABANDONING their post.  Even after my explanation, you still appear to believe it.  I dunno why.  If you actually THINK about it, you'd realize that they'd NEVER, NEVER, NEVER do that.  The people who told you that, are the SAME people telling you that Hillary murdered a cat.

    I don't LIKE Hillary, but murdering a cat?????

    excon This post was edited by excon at October 14, 2016 6:52 AM MDT
      October 14, 2016 6:42 AM MDT
    1

  • 35910
    I don't believe Hillary murdered the cat herself. I believe the Clintons hired someone to intimidate a witness against Bill Clinton. 
      October 14, 2016 6:49 AM MDT
    0

  • 17258
    Do you believe in ghosts too?
      October 14, 2016 6:53 AM MDT
    0

  • 35910

    Google Bimbo Eruption Squad....it is not ghost stories.  It is a of reporters, lawyers and PIs hired by the Clintons to destroy anyone who had the nerve to tell the truth about Clinton.
      October 14, 2016 8:14 AM MDT
    0

  • 17258
    2cents... We've been through this... Remember? 
      October 14, 2016 8:25 AM MDT
    0

  • 35910
    Yes I do...but  don't expect me to ignore comments when you make them to me.
      October 14, 2016 8:43 AM MDT
    0

  • 17258
    Don't expect me not to remind you we already covered it, if you do so. ;-)
      October 14, 2016 8:47 AM MDT
    0

  • 35910
    That is the topic.  I commented to excon. If you don't wish to cover it again, why make the comment? This post was edited by my2cents at October 14, 2016 8:54 AM MDT
      October 14, 2016 8:52 AM MDT
    0

  • 17258
    It's a public discussion, no? If it were a private discussion you two would take it somewhere private. I will from time to time respond on comments that catches my eyes. Just like you do with some of mine, and always have. It's part of being part of a social network, I guess. No offence.
      October 14, 2016 8:55 AM MDT
    0

  • 35910
    Agree 100%.  If you or anyone else would like to jump in...the more the merrier.  But if one does remember they will get comments back.  Why jump in IF you don't like the topic? or are not willing to discuss it again....  
    No offense taken.  Hope that is on both ends.
      October 14, 2016 9:04 AM MDT
    1

  • 17258
    It is fully on both ends. :-)
      October 14, 2016 9:25 AM MDT
    1

  • Exactly Rosie. Because we are.
      October 13, 2016 3:32 PM MDT
    2

  • 113301
     I was afraid you were going to tell me that sweetie. And you did. I dunno Lago. What's up with that anyway? :( Thank you for your reply and Happy Friday to you! :)
      October 14, 2016 3:47 AM MDT
    0