Active Now

Slartibartfast
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » When is a duckhead THREAT not a threat at all? When a duckhead adoring worshipper reads the words he used. WHY?

When is a duckhead THREAT not a threat at all? When a duckhead adoring worshipper reads the words he used. WHY?

Because a duckhead adoring worshippers is deaf dumb and blind to his massive despicable faults.

Case in point.

"There was no threats made to the Georgia Secretary of State"

Funny that it is only the duckhed adoring worshippers who says that. EVERYONE ELSE perceived with great clarify the IMPLIED THREATS.

And I quote
"TRUMP THREATENS GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE"

"TRUMP THREATENS GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE IF HE DOES NOT PRODUCE THOSE TRUMP VOTES"

"TRUMP CALL TO GEORGIA SECRETARY VOF STATE BREAKS ELECTION LAWS AND IS IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF TRUMP PRESSURING AND THREATENING"

"A VEILED THREAT.  'YOU COULD BE IN SERIOUS POLITICAL TROUBLE OR EVEN CRIMINAL TROUBLE' AS TRUMP THREATENS  VAGUE CRIMINAL CONSEQUENCES"


The adoring worshippers asks where is the threat? None so blind as those who refuse to see.

It is what it is. To the adoring worshipper no proof will ever convence them of his vile evil culpability. Give up. It's useless. It does not compute to them at all.

And so it goes. It is what it is. Everyone says so.

Posted - January 5, 2021

Responses