Covid shot proves to be 133x myocarditis. Why are we still trying to mandate this to children?

Talk to Israel Nation News.....they came to the same conclusion.   

They did not exclude people who took the clot shot. 


Someone needs to re-read the study and the article. And it is not me. 

You clearly didn't read the entire article.  The portion I posted was after the part you highlighted.  

Why are you quoting from a entirely different study?  
You are confusing two different studies. The one I quoted in my question is about the shots themselves harming people especially younger males. 

The study you are quoting is about the after effects of the disease itself not limited by age.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/3



22123

The quote I took was from the link you provided.  Perhaps you didn't read the entire article.  If some initial study says one thing and a subsequent study shows different information, should we just continue to believe the initial report - NO, WE SHOULDN'T.  Science doesn't stand still.  It evolves and we should  embrace the information that becomes apparent after the initial study.  If we didn't, we'd still be blood-letting as a medical procedure to cure a headache.  Why do you insist on only believing what is initially reported - even when subsequent information becomes available that changes how we treat a disease?  I'll tell you why - because you don't want to believe that the subsequent information doesn't jibe with what YOU want to believe.

No it is not.  The link I supplied it there. It still goes to the same article.  The quote you posted is not there.   
You should realize the studies are not studying the same things. One that I linked to is studying effects from the shot. The study you quoted is studying effects from the disease and, yes of course, they excluded people who had the shot.  That way the researchers know the effects observed are from the disease and not a vaccine side-effect.   
Why can't you just admit you read and quoted the wrong article? I also linked and screenshoted the article you quoted from. 



They have known about the damage the clot shots do to people's heart from the BEGINNING. (And other issues)  That is not "science that changed,"  that is science they have just quite trying to deny it. 
This is from OCT 2020. 


The only thing that changed is they now it affect younger males hearts more than females and older males.  But they have known about the damage since the beginning.   

This is the link at the bottom of the article you posted:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346

That is the link I opened.

Yet, what you quoted is NO where in the study.... This post was edited by my2cents at February 13, 2022 4:02 PM MST

What I quoted was taken from the link you posted at the bottom of your post.  That is not what comes up when you look at it now and I don't know why that happened.  I didn't just pull my quote out of thin air.  

No it was not.  You somehow moved to a different study or article.    

Show me a screenshot or at least where it is at on the page.   I showed you a screenshot of the article says talking about the different manufacturers  side effects.  Now they  could not have side effects from those jabs if they excluded  anyone who received a jab.  


This post was edited by my2cents at February 13, 2022 5:19 PM MST

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/new

This is the article you are quoting it is talking about  a different study published in a different site NATURE MEDICINE about effects from the disease NOT the jabs.

Here is the screen of what you are quoting from another article on IsraelNationalNews: