Discussion » Questions » Environment » Think your town should get some of these instead.of planting trees?

Think your town should get some of these instead.of planting trees?

Posted - March 30, 2023

Responses


  • 845
    I don't think so! How many people have to constantly fight against that very thing in their fish tanks. How much oxygen output does that produce compared to a real tree? Ridiculous!

    By the way, aren't those real trees and bushes in the background?
      March 30, 2023 9:08 PM MDT
    3

  • 32359
    Yep. I thought having real trees in the background was funny.
    They call them what they want but that is not a tree.
      March 31, 2023 4:52 AM MDT
    2

  • 845
    Exactly!
      March 31, 2023 7:28 AM MDT
    2

  • 2539
    No.  Trees are much prettier and provide housing for birds - these do not.
      March 30, 2023 10:02 PM MDT
    3

  • 32359
    I agree. These are not trees.
      March 31, 2023 4:53 AM MDT
    2

  • 845
    ...and they're ugly.
      March 31, 2023 7:29 AM MDT
    3

  • 44115
    They are ugly. We have an entire lake full of algae, we don't need tanks of them.

      March 31, 2023 7:37 AM MDT
    1

  • 32359
    That is a pretty green. :)
      April 1, 2023 6:20 AM MDT
    1

  • 17332
    Idiocy. 

    Of course not.

      March 31, 2023 9:48 AM MDT
    2

  • 32359
    I agree. But would be a great fish tank
      April 1, 2023 6:29 AM MDT
    1

  • 10027
    Thankfully, we have loads of trees, are quite attached to them and our greenspaces and have no need for supplemental oxygen producers/carbon dioxide absorbers. I presume that is the purpose of the 'liquid trees' pictured. Sadly, there are many urban areas that probably do need them. 
      March 31, 2023 8:57 PM MDT
    2

  • 32359
    I assume that is the purpose as well.  
    But at the same time it takes up more room than a tree would. 
    And I see some people taking these home. These would be a nice fish tank. 
      April 1, 2023 6:05 AM MDT
    1