The AnswerMug Challenge Series, Fun With English Edition: what are some English-language nouns that can NEVER be pluralized?

Hmm.  Normally I'd go with things like 'mud' or 'love', but I don't think they qualify exactly.

I'll go for 'Help' I think.  And 'Chess'.  And 'Dust'.

deer

Moose

Ice

Thriftymaid.  There is only one.

Wow, very good answers. Truly food for thought, thanks.
~

Deer is the plural of deer. Sorry, disqualified.

~

Hey . . . !

:)

Hmmmmm.

While difficult to do cleanly, the former can be pluralized just like the word "deer". I saw seven deer a two moose at the lake over the past summer.
~

*and two moose.........?* 

Ice

oh Karen just said that one.

Rice

help is not a noun.

I like the other 2.

Fish

The word fish IS plural: there are a lot of fish in the pond.
~

Not so; there is a lot of rice in the pantry (it's not one rice).

I'll give you ice, good answer.
~

It's a bit confusing because mooses doesn't sound right.
~

Help is a noun.
-

There's no need to be vulgar, and adding an s or es at the end of an English word is not the only way to pluralize it, which is part of the purpose I posted this question.

Oh, and by the way, if you kept your mother off the streets . . .
:|

and two moose, not a two moose.... :) 

You rigged this challenge!

It's not rigged, really it isn't! Many people assume or assumed that I meant adding an s or es at the end of a word in order to pluralize it, but it's not my fault if they made that mistake!

:)

Yes, I agree. I was wrong to treat you that way, yet I still dislike you with a great intensity.

This just proves grammar autistics will argue with each other while people with real intelligence and imagination create new things instead of just focusing on archaic rules.