Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Some computer experts say election was rigged and want Hillary to request a recount. Perfect, right?

Some computer experts say election was rigged and want Hillary to request a recount. Perfect, right?

The 3 states in question are Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. The experts say there are signs of voting irregularities. This is probably the same kind of bullsh** crap Trump tried to pull when he was whining about  the rigged election but looked stupid as a brick wall when he won. Hillary is not floating this so don't go off on her. This is not coming from her and I'm sure she will ignore it.  What IS true and IS a fact is that over 1.7 million people MORE voted for Hillary than voted for Trump. AND COUNTING. Will that number reach 2 million? 2.5 million? 3 million? God only knows and He isn't telling.

Posted - November 23, 2016

Responses


  • 17261
    Noop. It's not the majority. You can claim a lot of stuff, but not this. HRC is in lead with the popular vote which will be the majority of Americans. Smh.
      November 25, 2016 2:43 AM MST
    0

  • 44
    If you will be so kind as to take another look at what I stated, you would see where I said Americans. The dems stuffed the boxes with people that have no business voting in a country that they don't have citizenship in. Do you think Mexico would let a herd of Americans come over on election day and allow us to vote? Here, I'll answer that for you, of course not, do you know why they wouldn't allow it? Because it's just plain stupid. There was literally millions of votes that should never have been allowed to vote, and that's not counting the names of dead people they used. So cry all your little tears out, but don't drown in them.
      November 26, 2016 5:10 AM MST
    0

  • 17261
    Smh. 
      November 26, 2016 5:15 AM MST
    1

  • 44
    Clearing out the cob webs? Ope, you messed up your hair shaking your head, that's ok, I like that wild look.
      November 26, 2016 5:41 AM MST
    0

  • 17261
    Smh as there's no sense talking to a delusional. Keep those conspiracy theories as you're crutch in life. They will support you but not make you walk straight and by own will. Take good care. Bye.
      November 26, 2016 9:09 AM MST
    0

  • 44
    You look hot when your mad. Talking to you liberals is like talking to a wall, you think your right because that's what they tell you. If you quit believing everything they tell you and research the subject it would literally change your life and turn your world upside down. It's a real bitch and can cause depression, at least that's how it effected me. I'm a better person thinking for myself and not being a Muppet for the left. Try to step back and look at what they are doing with head games.
      November 26, 2016 5:14 PM MST
    0

  • 3934
    Re: Talking to you liberals is like talking to a wall.

    Yep, we Factinistas on the Nerd Patrol, insisting upon evidence, context, and consistent standards.

    We take all the fun out of Truthiness...;-D...


      November 26, 2016 5:24 PM MST
    1

  • 17261
    Don't you worry, you haven't seen me mad. But hey... have a w*nk thinking you did if it makes you feel better. Let me give you something to clean up your mirror when you're finished, to have a better view of where your conspiring index finger is pointing.



    Now if if you will have me excused, I have no more time for not debating. Keep throwing your conspiracies though if they make you feel like the name of the window and glass cleaner. Ciao. This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at November 26, 2016 6:00 PM MST
      November 26, 2016 5:48 PM MST
    0

  • Watch this.  You ready.   It's gonna be a good one.

    You look hot when your mad. Talking to you hyper-cons is like talking to a wall, you think your right because that's what they tell you. If you quit believing everything they tell you and research the subject it would literally change your life and turn your world upside down. It's a real bitch and can cause depression, at least that's how it effected me. I'm a better person thinking for myself and not being a Muppet for the far right . Try to step back and look at what they are doing with head games.

    It works both ways.  You lose the any and all credibility ( even if you aren't full of chit) when you rely on labels  for the person or  opposing view you're trying to debate.   A retort that relies on demeaning the opposition shows a major flaw in your ability to express an opinion and flimsy logic in your assessment.  It's a clear indicator that you have nothing of substance to say in your defense.

    We hear it all the time.
    " What does he know?   He's a queer."
    " Oh that's just the opinion of a bunch of negros."
    " They can't think straight with their liberal minds."
    "  You just say that because of your conservative thinking."
    "You don't support the war efforts because you're un-American."
    "  You're struggling because you are a socialist who wants hand outs instead of working."
    "  You're capitalist mindset means you don't care about the needy."
    " You have no moral compass because you are an atheist and morals are handed down from God.  What stops you from lying, killing, and raping?"  ( My personal favorite since it says a crap ton more about the morality and mentality of the accuser than it does about the one being accused.)
    etc.

    It's BS without any justification for the claims.  Just using labels as a way of  dismissing the value of another opinion or view so you don't have to put any real effort in explaining or justifying your stance. 
      November 26, 2016 5:55 PM MST
    1

  • 3934
    Apparently, the arguments for the recount were somewhat distorted by the Times reporting, and fivethirtyeight.com indicates they can find no statistical evidence which supports the supposition computerized voting was significantly hacked.

    Instead, some disparaties in demographic factors, once accounted for, remove apparent differnces in paper ballots versus computerized votes.

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking-explain-the-election-results/


    Note: Regardless, I ***still*** believe ALL election voting should be on hard-copy paper ballots, even if they are generally tabulated by computers.
      November 24, 2016 9:45 PM MST
    2

  • 44
    We agree on this. I would take it a bit further and require proof of citizenship. If we allow immigrants to vote they would have the ability to turn our country into the country they just fled.
      November 25, 2016 2:33 AM MST
    1

  • 17261
    Oh, you mean like the white people have done with America back in the history?
      November 25, 2016 2:44 AM MST
    0

  • 34272
    Citizenship should have to be proven to register to vote...not simply check the box.  And photo ID should be shown at the voting both. 
      November 25, 2016 4:01 AM MST
    1

  • 44
    I 100% agree m2c. Other wise bad things could happen like, ooh, IDK, ummm, say the dems could win the house, senate & potus.
      November 26, 2016 5:15 AM MST
    0

  • 113301
    Mahalo for your reply OS.
      November 26, 2016 6:05 AM MST
    0
  • Moi

    44
    Living in the heart of Indian country, The Uintah Ouray Reservation, I've heard all about that. Allow me this moment to enlighten you. All through history man has battled one another for ground, due to one rule. A rule I think could be traced back to that scoundrel Murphy, the the grass is always greener rule. The American Indians used it, the Mexicans used it, I dare you to find any group that hasn't used it at one point or another. It kind of goes with another rule something to do with survival of the fittest. It's in all humans DNA and you can accept or you can live in denial, but it's in you too! So SapphicHeart don't look down your nose at me. This post was edited by Moi at November 26, 2016 6:06 AM MST
      November 25, 2016 3:49 AM MST
    2

  • 113301
    I realize this is directed at Sapphic Heart, not me. But I intrude to simply thank you for your reply and wish you a Happy Saturday Moi. Parlez-vous Francais?
      November 26, 2016 6:07 AM MST
    0

  • 44
    Nein, sorry. I do speak fluent four letter Eengleesh though. And you are always welcome to step into my conversations.
      November 26, 2016 5:33 PM MST
    0

  • Uhhhh...  Might want to look up Murphy's Law before you go around incorrectly attributing it to other unrelated colloquialisms.  Just sayin'.
      November 26, 2016 6:07 PM MST
    0