Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » PET goes to Washington to drain the swamp and smash a corrupt system. Why? So he can install his own corrupt sytem of course! SMART, right?

PET goes to Washington to drain the swamp and smash a corrupt system. Why? So he can install his own corrupt sytem of course! SMART, right?

Posted - December 11, 2016

Responses


  • 1615
    Get rid of your negative attitude Rosie, is very unhealthy, I know liberals have a hard time with reality bur I'm concerned about you, she lost and that's it, believe me better days are coming. What have we got to lose? he will be gone Jan,20th, just hold in there don't let the last eight years get you down.
      December 11, 2016 11:38 AM MST
    0

  • 3934
    @TT -- Sorry, right wingers didn't just "Get over it" when the Democratic Party swept both houses of Congres and the Presidency in 2008.

    http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/11/24/1603910/-To-Those-Trumpsters-Who-Say-We-Didn-t-Complain-When-Your-Side-Won-Please-Review

    Those of us who are opposed to Der Pumpkinfuhrer are under no obligation to shut up just because you say so....;-D...
      December 11, 2016 12:30 PM MST
    1

  • 1615
    We didn't like it but we sure didn't cry about, it we did something about it and cleaned house and got rid of the do nothing welfare administration, Chicago is Obama's Legacy aren't you proud?

      December 11, 2016 9:23 PM MST
    0

  • 3934
    Re: We didn't like it but we sure didn't cry about it....

    OH REALLY, F***ING HYPOCRITE?

    May I suggest the following video, especially about 0:40 in with the multiple examples of RWAF butthurt?

    http://www.cc.com/video-clips/qi4qnn/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-reform-madness---white-minority
    RWAFs whined up a storm! The fact you've conveniently forgotten about it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    As for your claim Obama is solely responsible for socioeconomic conditions in Chicago when he was NEVER
    a city government official and an Illinois State Senator (one of 59 ) for a whopping 8 years...well, we've already
    established you're not a member of the Reality-Based Community. I'm sorry your hatred of N*gg*rs makes you
    so blind. This post was edited by OldSchoolTheSKOSlives at December 12, 2016 2:03 AM MST
      December 11, 2016 9:33 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    :):):) Happy Monday OS! :)
      December 12, 2016 2:05 AM MST
    0

  • 1615
    Talk about going off the deep end, I only meant that Obama could have had the Justice Dep. look into the corruption going on in Chicago and he didn't do a thing.
      I find it disturbing that you immediately went into a ranting and accused me of things I am not, I was only voicing my opinion of which I still feel he could have helped clean up the corruption. I wish you well.
      December 12, 2016 9:03 AM MST
    0

  • 3934
    @TT -- Funny how quickly RAWFs llike you conveniently forget WHAT THEY ACTUALLY SAID when their BS is called out.

    Then it's a bunch of hand-waving and "I didn't say that" and "I only meant...."

    Sorry, if you're not saying what you mean the first time, then you are either not aware of what you are saying (which means you're are letting your fingers run wild without engaging your brain) or you are deliberately LYING.

    Either way, it's BS...;-D...
      December 12, 2016 10:59 AM MST
    0

  • 1615
    You are entitled to your opinion but not worth my time, maybe someone else is willing to play your blame game, seek help if you need it. This post was edited by TomThumb at December 12, 2016 9:53 PM MST
      December 12, 2016 9:50 PM MST
    0

  • 113301
    :):):)
      December 12, 2016 2:05 AM MST
    0

  • 113301

    How does this response have anything remotely to do with the question I asked Tom? You can do better this. At least you have in the past. Your annoyance at people because they don't love your guy to he** is not my problem. You love him.  Fine. You don't mind that Russia/Putin engineered his win. Fine. You don't mind that PET is in way over head so far he is already drowning. Fine. You love the folks he picked for government jobs. Fine. You don't mind that he refuses daily intelligence briefings because he says he is a smart guy and if anything "REALLY IMPORTANT" is in those briefings he will make time for them. He lets Mike Pence sit in on them. He is a good delegater I guess.

    The folks he has picked so far for his administration either know absolutely nothing about the job they are supposed to do or they are ALT RIGHT WHITES. Tillerson is in bed with Putin and has been for years and was awarded a Friend of Russia medal or something. PET is in bed with Putin. That is very clear. He continues to attack the Intelligence Community and Democrats for saying Russia had anything to do with hacking American computer files. He is DEFENDING PUTIN AND RUSSIA and attacking his own people. That is okay with you apparently. It is not okay with me. So the threesome is what you would call a menage a  trois and that might be your cuppa tea but it isn't mine. You condescendingly write off my talking about PET as whining. This is a question and answer site. It is made up of people with many different views. There are citizens from all over the world here who weigh in and have every right to do so. PET is not just a local problem. He is a global problem. He is a billionaire who will use the presidency to enrich himself and his cronies. That doesn't bother you? Fine with me.  But when you pull Obama into a discussion having zero to do with my question you show how desperate you are to justify the abomination that was foisted on our country by you and others just like you when you voted for this clown. The people did not speak. The majority do not want PET. By over 2.6 million so far. The majority gets screwed royally because of some arcane rule that is no longer applicable..that is if the point is to have the people get whom they want to represent them. You do not acquit yourself well when YOU whine about those who aren't charmed by PET. Your standards are clearly not the same as mine.  That's fine with me. That's your business not mine.  I expect more from a president.  You are happy with PET. You look forward to his reign as  Despot King/Czar/PUTIN PUPPET. I do not. Different strokes. But I shall continue asking questions that occur to me as they occur to me. That is why I am here. I don't ask questions to please you or anyone else. I ask them to please me hoping that there are people out there who share  my concerns. Also to have folks with different views  share them as long as they respect  my views. Insulting someone does not bode well for further understanding or dialogue. Perhaps in your world insults are the medium of exchange. Not in my world. Thank you for your reply and Happy Monday. I fear for our country. I fear for our world. I fear people like you because of what you support. It is what it is. I invite you to ignore all of my questions if they unsettle you or upset you or disappoint you. You don't have to be here you know. I'm not the only one asking questions. You are welcome to answer the questions you like and ignore the ones you don't. We have had some very fine discussions. Perhaps we will have more. But not if you persist in this methodology. Because what's in it for me? I have to get something substantive/valuable from i t or I have wasted my time. I am giving you this very long reply because of past thoughtful conversations. If it is worth  anything to you perhaps you will be more cautious in the words you choose to use in the future. If not, oh well. It was great fun but it was just one of those things! :)

    This post was edited by RosieG at December 12, 2016 2:32 AM MST
      December 12, 2016 2:04 AM MST
    0

  • 1615
    Hi again Rosie, your reply was quite lengthy and informative but quite off base, let me add my two cents if I may without upsetting you.
      I enjoy answering your questions and assume you prefer peoples opinions but not politically correct or kiss a-- answers as I'm sure most people do in todays society ( phonies ) Your questions are obviously meant to get responses kissing up to the Obama, liberal, Democratic, Clinton, agenda of which I do not agree with their policies I do not particularly like Trump or Hillary but I feel we need to move away from liberal policies of the Democratic party which is making our country A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY.
        if you read your questions twice you might realize they are also asked in a bias way which will trigger a bias response. BUT that being said I do enjoy communicating with you and try to answer your questions with more tactfulness as to not to upset you, though it's not as informative when one has to say what you have to say what someone wants to hear just to appease them.
                           HAVE A GREAT DAY ROSIE BABY! KEEP ON TRUCKING.
      December 12, 2016 9:31 AM MST
    0

  • 13395
    His own corrupt system? 

    I think it might be his dream to establish The Kingdom of Trump.

    The Oval Office will become the Throne Room... This post was edited by Kittigate at December 12, 2016 11:03 PM MST
      December 12, 2016 10:56 PM MST
    0