Surely the only way to substantiate or refute that would be by seeing how many manly men who bought them. If the proportion - and they would have to do a heterosexual test at the checkout - is over 40% then no, it is not sexist ;)
I can't abide pink. So I suppose if the proposition is correct then I'm either masculine or a butch lesbian, something like that. Which I'm not for clarification purposes.
I interestingly enough two centuris ago pink was the colour for guys and blue for girls ... Go figure., Knowing that now your answer may need revising ... Or are you confused enough? :)
I think I got it, Oz. ;) ;) ;) (that's my nervous twitch, btw). And I've heard that too. Wasn't there a really daft reason for assigning these colour biases in the first place and an equally daft one for swapping them over?
Don't know... Sounds like a research paper coming up... But i do remember reading in the article that at the time blue was considered too effiminate for boys
So are the blue Kitchen Aid appliances equally sexist? Or just the pink (magenta) So are all pink/purple products sexist simply because more females purchase them?
Does the blue range have 'for men' as it's advertising heading? If not then no in the same way that this (magenta) range wouldn't be if it didn't have 'for women' as it's target market, yes?
Well of course it's sexists and I am DEFINITELY very upset about this, I am starting a letter-writing, phone-calling campaign right this minute (4:30 AM PST), because I really really need for MY kitchen, and everyone else kitchen in the world, to be PC-ness !!! ;)
Ha ha, Ozgirl, pc-ness = my rendition of "political correct-ness" ...PC being essential in today's modern kitchen, don't you agree?
This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at March 22, 2017 5:58 AM MDT