http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pet-owner-says-he-shot-15-year-old-dog-to-death-to-end-her-suffering/
FACT: Only people who are not capable of logical thinking consider his actions as animal cruelty.
In some places that is defined on the books as an act of cruelty. Without knowing the specifics of the locale, the universal truth is that the police are tasked with enforcing whatever the written law says. Now that he is charged it is up to the courts and jury to find if he breeched any of the laws as written.
It's worth noting that the dog was discovered by a passer by who noticed the dead dogs paw protruding from the beach sand. Which suggest the owner didn't really do much in properly disposing or burying the beloved pet. That little nugget brings a lot of questioning to this story and is in itself somewhat suspicious.
It could be that he did so in an area were shooting your dog is always illegal on abuse claims or it could be that the case was deemed shady and worthy of a court hearing considering it seems that he just threw some sand over the body and left it there.
Well, it's surely possible that the man shot his dog as an act of mercy, and I do not blame him for not "euthanizing" Allie just when or because the veterinarian recommended it.
I know that Virginia Beach is a very populated area, and has been for a long time. Only someone incapable of logical thinking, would shoot their dog and bury her on a beach there. I think Whalen's story sounds rather odd, too. He has a lawyer.....perhaps he'll be acquitted of the charges.
That has not been my experience, even with some supposedly "reputable vets". I agree that no ethical veterinarian would. Yes, you DO have a point there, about it being more financially advantageous to continue treating an animal.
I do not know if the dog was choking to death, or would have on the way to an animal hospital.