Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » 35 years old. A "natural-born citizen". Having lived in the US for 14 years . Requirements for prez. No wonder we get what we get. Should our requirements be tougher/stricter/harder to achieve? Why?

35 years old. A "natural-born citizen". Having lived in the US for 14 years . Requirements for prez. No wonder we get what we get. Should our requirements be tougher/stricter/harder to achieve? Why?

  Don'cha think if we insisted on more the quality of the candidates would be better? When is requiring less best? Why?

Posted - July 18, 2016

Responses


  • 46117

    First we need to understand what quality even is.  Then go from there.

    I would rather have someone who is QUALIFIED.  Trump is a natural born citizen of the USA.  What good did that do us?

    I don't care if the person is from ISRAEL,  MOZAMBIQUE or HELL, if he is a proven winner of justice, truth and the American way of life, I will vote for him over any pedigreed dolt like Trump any day of the year.   It helps to have a record of achievement.  Let's start with that one.


    RECORD

    OF
    ACHIEVEMENTS

    It is up to us to determine the quality after that resume'. 

      July 18, 2016 10:07 AM MDT
    0

  • 1615

    You are absolutely right Rosie this administration is proof that a person would find it harder to qualify for most any other job.

      July 18, 2016 1:47 PM MDT
    0

  • 503

    HUH ???

      July 18, 2016 3:21 PM MDT
    0

  • 113301

    I perceive a  90 degrees slant here TT. Correct me if I'm wrong but you put all blame on Democrats/Liberals and think your team is A-OK. Correct? So all the brains and perfect folks who never make a mistake are Republicans rights and all the screwups are Dems correct?  Thank you for your fair and balanced views. It is very nice that you don't skew or slant or favor one side over the other.

      July 20, 2016 6:47 AM MDT
    0