.
I can say what I will about Hillary yes. It will take about 3 paragraphs.
I can say what I will about Trump and his lies and his tramp wife and it will take more pages than the Encycolpedia Britanica. Is this something for the wife of a Presidential candidate to be proud of? Can you IMAGINE if Michelle Obama had pics like this ANYWHERE? Trump would have had them splashed all over FOXNews before you can say CHEAPSLUT. He would have used that idea even before the fake birth certificate lies. I'll bet the photographer coached her to give a look into the camera that says MY CROTCH IS ON FIRE and point to it.
Melania is a beautiful woman.
I agree, flipper.
Maybe she is, maybe she isn't.
To my knowledge, no one has established HRC has signifcantly plagarized any of her speeches or writings. That doesn't excuse many of her other shortcomings.
Yes. I guess you would go there. Snore. So are half the NORMAL honest women in the world. They don't parade around with a killer troll who makes George Bush look like a normal President. They don't pose in their underwear and less and hope that the nation will think they are a beautiful woman.
This is the kind of stuff we are warned not to post on the internet. But if you are a bimbo married to a rich guy then it is HOT. Also if you are horny and need to relieve yourself, there are even more nudes of her at your fingertips. Vote for TRUMP.
Beauty fades and brains do not grow bigger.
How would you know?
Many of her speeches, like the ones she gave to the Wall Street bankers that she professes to hate so much, are protected by non-disclosure agreements and no transcripts apparently exist either. Only old Slew-foot knows what words those speeches contain and even he's not talking . . .
No not right. Hillary has a history of plagiarism.
http://observer.com/2016/03/hillary-clintons-blatant-plagarism/
@m2c -- While I'm not following the alleged Meliana plagarism closely because I don't really give a s**t, I have to ask if the "plagarism" claims in the link are reasonable.
What I observed was the use of single sentences or phrases, some as short as just a few words. If we applied that standard of "plagarism" to the world at large, no one would be able to say anything without attribution and/or copyright payments.
For example, I frequently incorporate the phrase "Reality-based Community" when I critcize people who substitute their wish-to-believe on ideological grounds for empircal observation of reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community
Do I owe Karl Rove royalties for that phrase? What about the guy who made a whole web site based on it?
At some point, "plagarism" simply becomes shared language. I don't need to cite attribution or pay royalties to use "Humpty Dumpty," "Jumping Jack Flash," or "We don't need no stinking badges." I'm just using language.
With the above in mind, the links you posted seem suspiciously like ad-hoc "NUH UH! Stoopid Ebil Libruhl Democraps do it, too!" attempts to deflect from whatever Mrs. Trump did, rather than a consistent rational comparison of content-cribbing by politicians across the political spectrum.
Old School
People would puke if Michelle posted something like this.
I have never uttered the words "Stupid Evil Liberal Democraps" in my life. You are the only one I ever seen who uses those type phrases.
Mrs. Trump speech was plagarism. And yes they all do it. Some more outfront about it. Hillary does just use phrases. Obama in 2008 used alot parts of other peoples speeches. They all do it (both sides of the aisle).
I personally don't care either. I was simply answering the question. The question makes an assumption that H Clinton does not. She has.....
