.
Most of it was stoking identity politics and attempting to manipulate the maternal instincts of women.
In my country the prime minister's wife is not a political figure. The concept of a first lady is rather strange to me. She wasn't elected to anything, so why does anyone give a damn what she thinks?
The only statement of real political meaning was when she invoked Hillary's Cultural Marxist book "It Takes a Village". Completely shameful.
It's the same here other than hillary clinton and michelle obama.
Shameful, yes.
It would never occur to me to hear it. My TV is off. No convention watching here. What good could it do. It would certainly not change anyone's mind. It is foolishness. Before people lived with a screen in their face all the time conventions were functional and important. Today they are just money thrown away.
Wasserman-Schultz was begging congress not long ago for a few million bucks so the dems could even have a convention. Do you know if she got it or did they fund it some other way?
