You shouldn't judge people just for not having pets. There could be an allergy in the family or maybe they don't have the time or resources to properly care for an animal. Maybe the person travels a lot or lives in a building that doesn't allow pets. It's the same way you shouldn't judge people for not having children. Not everyone is cut out for it. I'm talking about people in general, not Trumpsie.
If allergies are involved or one is not home enough to care for them of course having a pet is counterproductive Patch. Also older folks shouldn't have them because the pet will outlive them and then who takes care of them? There are a variety of logical practical reasonable sensible reasons to not have pets. But usually normal kids WANT to have a pet. As far as I know the evil monster Donald John never had one. Maybe he wanted one but his parents said no. I don't know. He is a weird one though. Not normal in any sense of the word. Thank you for your reply and Happy Tuesday.
Speaking generally, I do think that pet-people are usually nicer, except for the ones who don't care for them properly, or those who get rid of them when they become inconvenient, aged or ill. I believe it's indicative of a level of selflessness.
Maybe Trump will consider one of the endangered animal carcasses that his elder sons bring back from Africa a pet?
Touche m'dear. The evil monster Donald John is such a good daddy. He will support whatever his little boys do including the murder/carnage of animals for their pleasure. SIGH. Thank you for your reply SA and Happy Tuesday! :)
Patchouli 