Active Now

Malizz
Discussion » Questions » Communication » Does the internet need to be neutralised? It seems ok to me

Does the internet need to be neutralised? It seems ok to me

Posted - December 6, 2017

Responses


  • 13071
    No. I think it should remain free.
      December 6, 2017 2:15 PM MST
    5

  • 17614
    That means neutralized.  :)
      December 6, 2017 11:20 PM MST
    0

  • 46117
    It needs to be neutered.
      December 6, 2017 3:55 PM MST
    1

  • Meow
      December 6, 2017 5:39 PM MST
    1

  • 19937
    Maybe just a bit.  It does get somewhat acidic at times.
      December 6, 2017 8:40 PM MST
    2

  • 17614
    Absolutely!!  
      December 6, 2017 11:21 PM MST
    1

  • 5354
    If you have plans to make changes you must put pretty words on your proposed change. If "Neutralize" was the prettist word they could find that tells us that pretty words for the change were hard to find.

    And if the proposed change is the move to give paying backbone using companies higher speed, Then the word neutralize is also pretty misleading. for one thing non-paying companies (like AM) will be getting slower speeds; not really a 'neutral' change to make
      December 7, 2017 3:18 AM MST
    1

  • 5614
    Aye, indeed unless you like slow speed downloads and streaming because you don't pay as much as other people and what you view is found to be objectionable.
    NET NEUTRALITY creates equal speeds for everyone. This post was edited by O-uknow at December 10, 2017 3:42 AM MST
      December 7, 2017 7:24 AM MST
    1