So now they don't have to stifle it any longer. Whatever he says is OK with them and whatever they say is OK too. Being proud of whom you are out loud must be a relief. They were silenced and underground for so long. He's a hero to them and always will be. He says what they have thought for many years and gets away with it and becomes even more respected and popular and adored by them because of it. Agreement/consensus is a wonderful thing. Knowing it's OK to be you. Comforting.
Hello again, Rosie:
And, I disagree with you.. I REFUSE to make any of this stuff personal.. It's interesting that you ended your post with the words my2cents.. She's your friend. And, she supports Trump. I disagree with her too, but I would never ascribe HIS racism with HER.
excon
Hello again,
I thought right wingers UNDERSTOOD what law and order is about.. No, huh??
Couple things.. She was APPOINTED to represent him. That means she REPRESENTS him, whether she LIKES it or not. It DOESN'T mean she should throw him under the bus. It doesn't MATTER what she thought, or believed. Her JOB was to represent him, and represent him WELL. And, she DID.. That she enjoyed WINNING is something a Trump supporter should understand.
Furthermore, I WANT my president to UNDERSTAND the law. She does... You don't.
excon
That's fine excon. I am not you. I stand by what I said. When you disagree with something and remain silent you condone it. Supporting Trump is more important to people than rejecting his racism/bigotry/misogyny/homophobic hatemongering OUT LOUD. When I ask directly why I never get an answer. I get red herrings. You cannot justify that which is unjustifiable so they don't even try. They simply change the subject. That is not satisfactory to me . At all . Ever.. When you don't speak up and out and reject out loud that which is disgusting and revolting you are giving tacit approval which means you share the views. If you don't share the views and despise them how can you accept the man who holds the despicable views?. We don't need to agree you and me. If it walks like a duck, looks like duck, sounds like a duck it is a duck. That is my simplistic view of life. If you see someone being attacked and sit on the sidelines and say/do nothing what does that say about you? OK. Moving on what's new with you?
Excon - She was not appointed. She did it as a favor as she admits in the youtube clip I posted above. She later lied and claimed she had no choice.
I do believe everyone deserves a defence. Though there are limits to what is ethical even for a defence attorney. A defence should attempt to introduce reasonable doubt not fabricate things. I suspect her of crossing the line.
The damning thing here is her tone of voice in that interview. She's talking about it like it's a joke. It's not triumph in her voice. She is DISCONNECTED. She's a sociopath.
I don't believe that woman has any conscience. It's just playing for the women's vote.
It seem popular for liberals to label anyone they don't like are racist, or homophobic. They don't need any evidence for this it just sort of sticks.
Hello again, AS:
Even IF she volunteered to take the case, that doesn't mean she should BLOW it.
Look.. You don't like her.. You think she's a murderer and a drug dealer.. If I thought that shit about Trump, I wouldn't want him to be president either...
excon
Excon 
Hello O:
Given the odds, wouldn't we be right now and then???
excon
Excon sure if you don't care about ethics. What Hillary did was a type of character assassination that allowed the use of using personal things against the victim in the court of law even IF it had NOTHING to do with the actual case itself. That's the point. Law also changes and if I do remember right I read something that was deemed illegal to do that to someone in court.
So sure we could go with the majority opinion of "well they know the law" in regards to what makes a person better over someone else.. I mean I could do meth because it's popular but I won't.