Discussion » Questions » Outside the Mug » If there are any typographical errors in the U.S. Bill of Rights, does that make it the Bill of Wrongs? ~

If there are any typographical errors in the U.S. Bill of Rights, does that make it the Bill of Wrongs? ~

Posted - February 17, 2018

Responses


  • 7280
    Interesting list.

    #10 Both of these words are verbs and nouns and their meanings overlap.

    #6 In these cases people have tried to apply logic, and it has failed them. Attempts to be logical about I could care less also fail. Taken literally, if one could care less, then one must care at least a little, which is obviously the opposite of what is meant. It is so clearly logical nonsense that to condemn it for being so (as some commentators have done) misses the point. The intent is obviously sarcastic — the speaker is really saying, “As if there was something in the world that I care less about”.

    #6 (from another site)  There’s a close link between the stress pattern of I could care less and the kind that appears in certain sarcastic or self-deprecatory phrases that are associated with the Yiddish heritage and (especially) New York Jewish speech. Perhaps the best known is I should be so lucky!, in which the real sense is often “I have no hope of being so lucky”, a closely similar stress pattern with the same sarcastic inversion of meaning. There’s no evidence to suggest that I could care less came directly from Yiddish, but the similarity is suggestive. There are other American expressions that have a similar sarcastic inversion of apparent sense, such as Tell me about it!, which usually means “Don’t tell me about it, because I know all about it already”. These may come from similar sources.
         
             https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/706/which-is-correct-could-care-less-or-couldnt-care-less
      February 17, 2018 10:11 AM MST
    1

  • 7280
    As to the question itself, It wasn’t until 1867 that Christopher Latham Sholes of Milwaukee invented the first typewriter, later sold and turned into the successful Remington typewriter.

    Were you  equating misspellings to typos, or was this a test?
      February 17, 2018 10:12 AM MST
    0

  • 53509


      Neither: I'm just joking around like I always do. 
    ~
      February 17, 2018 10:22 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    Yeah, that's so important.

    How about people who obstruct justice?  How about reading the letter of the Constitution instead of worrying about dotted i's and crossed t's.

    As long as it is understandable, we should worry more about people breaking the laws of it or ignoring the need to re-vamp and amend it.

    Not worry about paragraph indentations.

    I mean REALLY? 
      February 17, 2018 11:27 AM MST
    0

  • 5354
    I have seen 'Effect' used as a verb "His actions effected a change in the law."

    nice spiel here: https://www.diffen.com/difference/Affected_vs_Effected

    As for typographical error in the Bill of Rights, spelling were a lot looser back then. And especially in the colonies where schools and universities were yet to be built. This post was edited by JakobA the unAmerican. at February 17, 2018 1:51 PM MST
      February 17, 2018 1:42 PM MST
    0

  • 53509


    (spelling were)??


    :(
      February 17, 2018 5:27 PM MST
    0

  • 5354
    Spelling everywhere, Without good schooling it is difficult for people (pronounced peple) to spell things right This post was edited by JakobA the unAmerican. at February 17, 2018 7:56 PM MST
      February 17, 2018 7:55 PM MST
    0