Active Now

Slartibartfast
Discussion » Questions » Outside the Mug » Often taking responsibility is averted by the "I or we would not have done it if YOU had not allowed it" argument. In a

Often taking responsibility is averted by the "I or we would not have done it if YOU had not allowed it" argument. In a

hypothetical scenario is this argument a credible excuse for not owning up to what you have done?
"I could not have shot up all those people if YOU had not provided me with a gun" is one of countless examples.

Posted - March 18, 2018

Responses


  •   March 18, 2018 12:21 PM MDT
    0

  • 17558
    No, generally people are responsible for what they do.  When another provides misinformation to encourage the actor, that could affect responsibility IF a reasonable man would have no reason to verify the information.  If the act is an illegal one, the burden is much higher and generally conviction would not be averted.
      March 18, 2018 12:21 PM MDT
    0