Per Giuliani Ivanka should not be investigated. She's a fine woman."Men are disposable". I guess he means Jared. Why would he say that?

Mueller hasn't attacked anyone.  We have heard nothing at all from Mueller, so that explanation doesn't hold any water.  As for your "societal" reason, if a woman wants to play with the big boys on the world stage, she should be held to the same standards as a man.  If Ivanka is complicit in any criminal or obstructionist activities, she should "woman up and take it."

:):):)

Did I say Mueller has attacked Ivanka or anyone else? I was explained Rudy's statement and what it meant. You may not agree with Rudy's statement but that does not change what he meant. 

“Ivanka Trump? I think I would get on my charger and go ride into their offices with a lance, if they go after Ivanka,” Giuliani told Fox News host Sean Hannity. “Now if they do do Ivanka, which I don’t think they will, the whole country will turn on them. If they go after her, the whole country will turn on them. They’re going after his daughter?”......."Jared is a fine man, you know that. But men are, you know, disposable,” Giuliani said with a laugh. “A fine woman like Ivanka, come on."

This post was edited by my2cents at May 7, 2018 3:16 PM MDT

I find it interesting that you are so able to know what is in the mind of Donald and his pals.  Perhaps they should put you on their legal team.  Better yet, you can fill in for Sarah Sanders when she's on vacation. 

To know what he meant you just have to read it...it is quite clear. 
I not good enough to do Sarah's job. And she is much nicer than me....I would punched that Wolf woman in her head. 

Really?  He makes that much sense to you?  Even when he changes his tune the next day? 

Deflecting again....the topic is Rudy Guiliani and what he said.  Yes, it made perfect sense. 

No deflecting.  Every day there's a different explanation by Giuliani for the Stormy Daniels payment.  Let's see what tomorrow's explanation is because I'm sure it will not be the same as today's.   THAT'S deflecting. 

No....the bottom line is.
The payment was made to Ms Clifford as hush money paid Attorney Cohen.  It would have been made whether or not Trump was running for President or not. And the money was repaid in 12 monthly installments.   Don't know what is so complicated...

If it's that simple, how is it that Trump claimed he didn't know anything about the payment to Ms. Daniels, didn't know that Michael Cohen made the payment out of his own funds, and didn't know that he repaid Cohen over a 12 month period?  Why didn't Trump just say that Daniels was blackmailing him and he agreed to pay her off to keep quiet?  Because he's a LIAR - that's why.

She got paid...she was obviously blackmailing someome.....whether it was directly Trump or from afar through Cohan etc, we don't know. Is it possible Trump did not know exactly what the monthly payments where for? Yes, I believe it is.

Why is it a surprise that a billionaire playboy lies about sex? 

I don't care if a millionaire lies about an affair.  I care if he lies about not knowing about payments that were made as hush money, that he lies just about every time he opens his mouth.

Really? That is how you perceive that? So women are delicate flowers from whom not much should be expected because as everyone knows women are second-class citizens including the first daughter? Really? Thank you for your reply m2c and Happy Saturday to thee! :) This post was edited by RosieG at May 5, 2018 11:50 AM MDT

It is not about what I precieve...it is what Rudy precieves. 
Is there some truth to it? Probably if not the would be no such thing as a "woman card" etc. 

You assume much if you are taking it upon yourself to explain Rudy to us m2c. Everything you post here is about what YOU perceive. You should only ever speak for yourself because you cannot possibly know what is in the brain or heart of Rudy G. Whatever he says it is up to YOU to interpet the meaning and comprehend the words.. You have to interpret them or they are useless. You would not show up here if you couldn't tell us what you perceive and believe. So I don't buy it. You cannot speak for others. Only yourself. Thank you for your reply m2c and Happy Sunday to thee.

He said nothing of the kind. He said that public opinion WOULD react badly to them going after Ivanka. Whether it SHOULD react badly is a different question. It WOULD react badly because that is human nature. People care more about the welfare of women especially beautiful women, than men.

This is especially true because everyone knows this investigation is bullsh*t. There are plenty of people who think trying to destroy the lives of innocent men in the Trump administration is all in the game. Though they wouldn't stoop so low as to try to destroy the life of Trump's daughter. Even most leftist scum think that's below the belt. This post was edited by Zeitgeist at May 6, 2018 7:20 AM MDT

Everyone does not agree with thee. You assume they do but they don't. You are in the minority. Good for youse. Stick to your guns. Stay on the ship of state alongside the john of don till it sinks and you drown.  Glug glug glug. :(

Facts are facts and TZ is correct. 

Rude much?

No. He has sex, right? Geez. What a bunch of losers. Anyone and everyone tied to the goofydoofylucytraitor john of don is going down. Well deserved. I can hardly wait. SIGH. Are we there yet? Are we having fun yet? Thank you for your reply Sharon! :)